RE: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??

Tech-Archive recommends: Speed Up your PC by fixing your registry

From: Joe (Joe_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/17/05 

Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:01:02 -0800

I am not sure if this has been mentioned yet, but in addition to SPS 2003,
BizTalk Server 2004 is touted as the worlds largest .NET code base with >1
million lines of C#. With an investment like that it is hard to convince me
that MS is not fully vested in its .NET strategy.

"Jonathan" wrote:

> I am not sure if this has been pointed out (I didn't read every post) But
> most of SharePoint is written in .NET and parts of SQL Server 2005 will be. I
> think someone mentioned .NET was released about 3 years ago and Microsoft has
> been busy getting it to a point where they want it. The newer applications
> are starting to include more and more .NET code; but it's a step by step
> transition just like any company.
>
> - Jonathan
>
> "Brian" wrote:
>
> > there are lots of serious applications, just because word isn't coded in .NET
> > doesn't mean that there arn't ones out there... I work for a large insurance
> > agency and all our recent upgrades on our software for insurance related
> > programs all seemed to of went to .NET based solutions. And these are real
> > world applications doing real world data handling, so I would qualify that as
> > a serious application
> >
> > "Herr Lucifer" <"\n" wrote:
> >
> > > As the founder of .NET framework, Microsoft claims that it invention will be
> > > the next best platform for programming in a near future. Now it is 2005,
> > > ..NET is 5 years old, and can talk and walk for himself with some help of his
> > > mum.
> > > However, we see the same native office applications are coming out again,
> > > and many other tools in SP2 of XP which could be in managed code....but are
> > > not. So, as the inventor of .NET , why doesn't Microsoft itself use "DOTNET"
> > > in its applications? Is there any concern over the baby's runnung
> > > performance inside Microsoft itself, or they gonna teach the baby how to run
> > > like a C kinda guy in future, so that they'll be able to use it for
> > > themselves?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >

Relevant Pages

  • RE: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??
    ... BizTalk Server 2004 is touted as the worlds largest .NET code base with>1 ... "Jonathan" wrote: ... >> world applications doing real world data handling, so I would qualify that as ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr)
  • RE: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??
    ... BizTalk Server 2004 is touted as the worlds largest .NET code base with>1 ... "Jonathan" wrote: ... >> world applications doing real world data handling, so I would qualify that as ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance)
  • RE: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??
    ... BizTalk Server 2004 is touted as the worlds largest .NET code base with>1 ... "Jonathan" wrote: ... >> world applications doing real world data handling, so I would qualify that as ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: Why to use Delhi.NET?
    ... HAlizieri wrote: ... > Can anybody give me some good reasons for starting an application ... new .NET code can be reused by people or applications that have not ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)