RE: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??
From: Jonathan (Jonathan_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/17/05
- Next message: Mochuelo: "Re: Thread safety of asynchronous sockets, also - documentation vs reality"
- Previous message: Rhyd: "Re: Simple: Excel Jet 4.0 Link vb 2005"
- In reply to: Brian: "RE: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??"
- Next in thread: Joe: "RE: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??"
- Reply: Joe: "RE: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 07:03:02 -0800
I am not sure if this has been pointed out (I didn't read every post) But
most of SharePoint is written in .NET and parts of SQL Server 2005 will be. I
think someone mentioned .NET was released about 3 years ago and Microsoft has
been busy getting it to a point where they want it. The newer applications
are starting to include more and more .NET code; but it's a step by step
transition just like any company.
- Jonathan
"Brian" wrote:
> there are lots of serious applications, just because word isn't coded in .NET
> doesn't mean that there arn't ones out there... I work for a large insurance
> agency and all our recent upgrades on our software for insurance related
> programs all seemed to of went to .NET based solutions. And these are real
> world applications doing real world data handling, so I would qualify that as
> a serious application
>
> "Herr Lucifer" <"\n" wrote:
>
> > As the founder of .NET framework, Microsoft claims that it invention will be
> > the next best platform for programming in a near future. Now it is 2005,
> > ..NET is 5 years old, and can talk and walk for himself with some help of his
> > mum.
> > However, we see the same native office applications are coming out again,
> > and many other tools in SP2 of XP which could be in managed code....but are
> > not. So, as the inventor of .NET , why doesn't Microsoft itself use "DOTNET"
> > in its applications? Is there any concern over the baby's runnung
> > performance inside Microsoft itself, or they gonna teach the baby how to run
> > like a C kinda guy in future, so that they'll be able to use it for
> > themselves?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
- Next message: Mochuelo: "Re: Thread safety of asynchronous sockets, also - documentation vs reality"
- Previous message: Rhyd: "Re: Simple: Excel Jet 4.0 Link vb 2005"
- In reply to: Brian: "RE: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??"
- Next in thread: Joe: "RE: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??"
- Reply: Joe: "RE: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|