Re: Anyone have info on the dreaded Q316146 bug? ... (i.e. There is no Original data to access)
From: Nick Malik (nickmalik_at_hotmail.nospam.com)
Date: 11/23/04
- Next message: Nick Malik: "Re: url parameter"
- Previous message: wdewebserver: "Multithreading and RollBacks"
- In reply to: malcolm: "Anyone have info on the dreaded Q316146 bug? ... (i.e. There is no Original data to access)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 06:41:30 GMT
Hi Dave,
> With that in mind, most medium to large size applications
> utilize some form of database and DataSets, DataTables, etc... is the
> new defacto way in .NET to represent this data in memory. This bug is
> very easy to get as your application get's more complicated.
Not really. As my application gets more complicated, I tend not to use
datasets for more than representations of static data from a single view or
resultset. I nearly never use Data adapters to update the database (except
for simple domain tables... Create-Update-Delete types of things).
Where I do use the Dataset, I tend to encapsulate it and use it for data
storage inside an object that doesn't look much like a Dataset at all.
As a result, I have never run into this bug.
I really don't care if MS ever fixes this bug, to be honest, although it
would be nice, just to empower those folks who are a little more daring than
I am. I support your call for MS to fix the bug, out of solidarity with
you, but not because I personally need it.
--- Nick
- Next message: Nick Malik: "Re: url parameter"
- Previous message: wdewebserver: "Multithreading and RollBacks"
- In reply to: malcolm: "Anyone have info on the dreaded Q316146 bug? ... (i.e. There is no Original data to access)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
