Re: Java and .NET (no Flames Pls)
From: Cowboy \(Gregory A. Beamer\) (NoSpamMgbworld_at_comcast.netNoSpamM)
Date: 09/16/04
- Next message: Plutian: "Logging on .Net"
- Previous message: Cowboy \(Gregory A. Beamer\): "Re: Net information Please"
- In reply to: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "RE: Java and .NET (no Flames Pls)"
- Next in thread: Daniel Billingsley: "Re: Java and .NET (no Flames Pls)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 21:50:46 -0500
I stand corrected on the refactoring, but I had it with some third party
tools at the job I had before working for the state. Overall, I still had
problems with Java IDEs in other areas.
Visual Studio gets much better in 2.0. I would like to see them put a real
slick WYSIWYG editor and even better XML support, but it is a great leap
from Visual Studio .NET 2003, which is already a great IDE overall.
-- Gregory A. Beamer MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA ************************************************* Think outside the box! ************************************************* "Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <skeet@pobox.com> wrote in message news:MPG.1bb25c273aa695f998b413@msnews.microsoft.com... > Cowboy (Gregory A. Beamer) - MVP <NoSpamMgbworld@comcast.netNoSpamM> > wrote: >> What .NET offers for me, over Java, beyond all of the FUD thrown out in >> perf >> comparisons, etc., is Visual Studio .NET, which is a great IDE. I have >> worked >> with Java IDEs and I feel they pale in comparison. I have not touched >> Java in >> a little over a year, so there may be a new version of JBuilder that >> really >> rocks. I am working on what I know from the past. NOTE: I am not saying >> choose a platform because it has cool tools. > > I found the exact opposite when I started with .NET. I missed (and > still miss) some of the wonderful features of Eclipse. It's nice to > know that Microsoft will have refactoring in VS.NET 2005 - only a few > years after Java developers started thinking of it as pretty much a > required feature for a decent IDE. > > We'll see whether VS.NET 2005 gets up to Eclipse's standard in other > areas, of course, but I'm skeptical. > > If you love designers, VS.NET may be the bee's knees - I prefer > actually writing code most of the time, and on that front, Eclipse is > in the lead IMO. > > -- > Jon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.com> > http://www.pobox.com/~skeet > If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
- Next message: Plutian: "Logging on .Net"
- Previous message: Cowboy \(Gregory A. Beamer\): "Re: Net information Please"
- In reply to: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "RE: Java and .NET (no Flames Pls)"
- Next in thread: Daniel Billingsley: "Re: Java and .NET (no Flames Pls)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
