Re: CasPol security
From: Chris Botha (chris_s_botha_at_AT_h.o.t.m.a.i.l.com)
Date: 05/25/04
- Next message: Larry Serflaten: "Re: Problem with IIS and IE..."
- Previous message: Frank Jones: "RE: PerformanceCounter & PerformanceCounterCategory on Windows 2003"
- In reply to: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "CasPol security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 19:24:44 -0400
My humble opinion, I gave our whole server full trust on all desktops. It is
locally on the Intranet, any non-dotnet app on the server can be executed
from any desktop without a hoot in any case and I don't have time to try and
figure out what the minimum trust level per application should be.
This kind of issue is important when you use no-touch deployment over the
internet, as you are loading an app from a foreign server, not that I've
stumbled upon one on some Internet site yet, but just in case.
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:11dba01c44251$77d1aa30$a301280a@phx.gbl...
> Whats the danger in doing:
>
> C:\...\caspol -enterprise -addfulltrust L:\foo.exe
>
> foo is a local network (non-web based) application that
> references internal databases and general web based
> information sites.
>
> Steve
- Next message: Larry Serflaten: "Re: Problem with IIS and IE..."
- Previous message: Frank Jones: "RE: PerformanceCounter & PerformanceCounterCategory on Windows 2003"
- In reply to: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "CasPol security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
