Re: .NET Compatibility
From: Mark Broadbent (no-spam-please_at_no-spam-please.com)
Date: 05/06/04
- Next message: Arturo: "Re: WebBrowser downloading from memory"
- Previous message: Sean: "GAC and the .NET IDE"
- In reply to: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: .NET Compatibility"
- Next in thread: Christopher Kimbell: "Re: .NET Compatibility"
- Reply: Christopher Kimbell: "Re: .NET Compatibility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 21:09:11 +0100
quite clever this windows XP gadget thingamy ;)
Thx for clearing that one up -see what he meant now.
-- -- Br, Mark Broadbent mcdba , mcse+i ============= "Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <skeet@pobox.com> wrote in message news:MPG.1b0495b4c756131798a86d@msnews.microsoft.com... > Mark Broadbent <no-spam-please@no-spam-please.com> wrote: > > XP can run .NET assemblies -in fact I develop using FW 1.1 /Visual Studio > > 2003 on an XP box. > > I believe Christopher was actually saying that without the framework > installed, XP can detect a .NET executable and tell the user that it > requires .NET - this is better than earlier versions of Windows, which > just give cryptic error messages. > > -- > Jon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.com> > http://www.pobox.com/~skeet > If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
- Next message: Arturo: "Re: WebBrowser downloading from memory"
- Previous message: Sean: "GAC and the .NET IDE"
- In reply to: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: .NET Compatibility"
- Next in thread: Christopher Kimbell: "Re: .NET Compatibility"
- Reply: Christopher Kimbell: "Re: .NET Compatibility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|