Re: VB6 to C++ converter

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Jonathan Pierce (jpierce_at_nyc.rr.com)
Date: 04/16/04


Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 03:39:51 -0700


Jason,

Lutz has written an excellent free product with Reflector and I have
used it often in comparing code generation. You might want to spend a
little more time evaluating our Decompiler.NET product before deciding
that you don't need to purchase Decompilation or Obfuscation software.
You are correct that I had used the same search keywords on the website
since I wanted to respond to similar search criteria and was too lazy to
make up new ones. I also used the CommandBar and ILReader modules
written by Lutz in the current implementation of Decompiler.NET and I
credit him fully in the Credits in the about Dialog. Other than what is
listed in the credits which I am authorized to use, the code in
Decompiler.NET was written entirely at Jungle Creatures. I do look at
Reflector and Salamander often to compare their code generation in
deciding whether mine is correct, but Decompiler.NET has a very
different implementation and generates very different and better code
than either of them. Salamander also does COM Interop and like
Decompiler.NET does a good job with inline assignments and nested
conditionals, but reflector does not generate nearly as complete code.
Decompiler.NET is the only product that generates code that compiles
100% as evidenced by itself. Decompiler.NET is priced very reasonably
compared to the competetive products and it obfuscation features which
others sell seperately.

Jonathan Pierce
President
Jungle Creatures, Inc.
http://www.junglecreatures.com/

*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Obfuscator and Decompiler
    ... > Remember that you asked Lutz to charge for Reflector because it makes ... The reason I asked Lutz to charge for his tool is so that he could ... justify spending more time supporting it and correcting problems with ... wastes more time tracking down dependant bugs that don't really exist. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.security)
  • Re: Performance-Frage: for oder foreach
    ... als wenn Du Lutz ... Roeder's Reflector genommen hast;-) ... Der bildet aber einen eigenen Pseudo-Code, ... der eine Art vereinfachende Darstellung ist. ...
    (microsoft.public.de.german.entwickler.dotnet.csharp)
  • Re: Counting number of users logged in
    ... public static int GetNumberOfUsersOnline; ... Declaring Type: System.Web.Security.Membership ... Use Lutz Roeder's Reflector to look up System.Web.Security.Membership class's source. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: .NET decompiler
    ... You might want to try Lutz Roeder's Reflector for .NET: ... take a look at his other free utilities. ... framework 1.1 and turn it into .vb code? ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: How does compare gcc to VS C++ ?
    ... >> or not you realize it, you're comparing the effeciencies of the two ... I'm comparing nothing other than code ... Then explain to me how you can be certain the observed performance ... difference can be attributed solely to code generation. ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)