Re: Com/ActiveX component to use on HTML page with javascript
From: Mikael Svenson (mikaels_at_powertech.no)
Date: 04/16/04
- Next message: hyknzf_at_ed.shawcable.net: "Little sisters nice tits and handjob 5542"
- Previous message: Dmitriy Lapshin [C# / .NET MVP]: "Re: Strong Name for VB COM dll"
- In reply to: Jerry Pisk: "Re: Com/ActiveX component to use on HTML page with javascript"
- Next in thread: Jerry Pisk: "Re: Com/ActiveX component to use on HTML page with javascript"
- Reply: Jerry Pisk: "Re: Com/ActiveX component to use on HTML page with javascript"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:33:38 +0200
That's what I hoped for. If I regasm /tlb mycomponent.dll on my dev
machine, and reference it with <object like I initially mentioned, I
still get the "unsafe activex" component. But guess I can dig into the
IE functions and just allow it all.
If you want I can post my code and settings to see if I'm doing
something wrong.
If I change the security settings for my IE instance, will this affect
the other IE's the user might have running?
-m
Jerry Pisk wrote:
>
> The Office components work because they're registered during Office
> installation. You can do your own thing, you can register your controls from
> within the installation process. Once the controls are registered you can
> use them without IE wanting to install them again. If you're going to embed
> IE in your app you can even control the security settings in it, so you can
> have it allow ActiveX controls even when the user disabled them for
> standalone IE.
>
> Jerry
>
> "Mikael Svenson" <mikaels@powertech.no> wrote in message
> news:407E52E1.F2B163C7@powertech.no...
> > Ok, so the reason using a graph component from Office works, is because
> > it's made by Microsoft? And I agree totally with the security issues. I
> > just thought that if you install and register a dll on the machine thru
> > a setup, that would be the same as to authorize it, and thus IE could
> > use it without any pop-ups afterwards.
> >
> > My scenario would be as follow:
> >
> > 1. User installs an application, with dll's which are registred
> > 2. My appbar/winform uses IE as part of the GUI
> > 3. the GUI instantiates the dll, and subscribes to events for it
> >
> > I might just go with making the whole app a winform, and not using
> > IE/html for part of the GUI stuff. I have IE as a component in an
> > appbar, and it would be very easy to change GUI stuff if I could have it
> > as a webpage somewhere. But I might just go with putting more stuff in
> > the winform, and use .Net's dll autoupgrade feature instead.
> >
> > Thanks for the replies :)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mikael Svenson
> >
> > Jerry Pisk wrote:
> > >
> > > It won't breeze by unless the user sets their IE to do so (but I don't
> know
> > > who in their right mind would do that). There's absolutely nothing you
> can
> > > do to force an ActiveX object installation on the user, they will always
> > > have to accept it (and even have the option to reject it for good
> starting
> > > with WinXP SP2) - with the exception of those who blindly accept
> everything
> > > but as I said, you don't want those users.
> > >
> > > Jerry
> > >
> > > "Mikael Svenson" <mikaels@powertech.no> wrote in message
> > > news:407D54C9.74F36EB8@powertech.no...
> > > > If I sign it, will the user be prompted once to accept the
> certificate,
> > > > or will it just breeze by?
> > > >
> > > > What I'm trying to accomplish is to use a .dll (or) ActiveX component
> > > > from a webpage to do certain tasks. Say the component checks a DB on
> > > > certain intervals and triggers an event which the web page acts on in
> > > > javascript.
> > > >
> > > > Will it be different if I make the component a ServicedComponent
> instead
> > > > and register it with regsvcs.exe?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Mikael Svenson
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Dmitriy Lapshin [C# / .NET MVP]" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > If I got you right, you should sign the component assembly with a
> > > Software
> > > > > Publisher Certificate. You can make one for testing purposes with
> .NET
> > > > > Framework SDK tools such as makecert.exe and cert2spc.exe.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Dmitriy Lapshin [C# / .NET MVP]
> > > > > X-Unity Test Studio
> > > > > http://www.x-unity.net/teststudio.aspx
> > > > > Bring the power of unit testing to VS .NET IDE
> > > > >
> > > > > "Mikael Svenson" <mikaels@powertech.no> wrote in message
> > > > > news:407D24E2.F48CD9B6@powertech.no...
> > > > > > I have managed to make an ActiveX component in C#, and I've made
> > > > > > refrenced it with
> > > > > > <object classid="CLSID:4606E9A6-F60D-4623-8892-DABE54E05282"
> > > height="10"
> > > > > > id="EventTester" width="10" viewastext></object>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > which works just fine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (I have specified the guid for the class, interface and assembly,
> and
> > > > > > have it strongly named)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The problem is that the component is unsigned, and requires the
> user
> > > to
> > > > > > accept it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My question is, how can I make a component which I can reference
> from
> > > a
> > > > > > html page without needing the user to accept it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The component will be installed on the client machine with an
> > > installer.
> > > > > > With C++ and regsvr32 this works just fine. You set your object
> tag
> > > once
> > > > > > it's registered and you're ready to go, but this don't seem to be
> the
> > > > > > case with .Net components.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Say I want to make a DLL which returns the Windows Version or
> > > something
> > > > > > with a string property.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <javascript>
> > > > > > alert( EventTester.Version );
> > > > > > </javascript>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And there is some code in the C# class which returns this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any help on the matter would be appreciated. I have googled quite
> a
> > > lot
> > > > > > already on this :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Mikael Svenson
- Next message: hyknzf_at_ed.shawcable.net: "Little sisters nice tits and handjob 5542"
- Previous message: Dmitriy Lapshin [C# / .NET MVP]: "Re: Strong Name for VB COM dll"
- In reply to: Jerry Pisk: "Re: Com/ActiveX component to use on HTML page with javascript"
- Next in thread: Jerry Pisk: "Re: Com/ActiveX component to use on HTML page with javascript"
- Reply: Jerry Pisk: "Re: Com/ActiveX component to use on HTML page with javascript"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|