Re: Calling Java WebService from .net Client

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Christian Wilhelm (ch.wilhelm_at_bigfoot.de)
Date: 12/08/04 

Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:47:40 +0100

Hi Dan,

first at all I want to thank you for your huge help!

At the Java-Server we are using
 * JBoss 4.0
 * Apache AXIS 1.1
 * Eclipse as IDE

How can I set my Client up to using "Document Literal"?
Is there a config File or is this set up in WSDL on the side of the server?
If it is done by WSDL, can you give me a point, how to do this?

Thank you very much again,
Regards,
Christian

"Dan Rogers" <danro@microsoft.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:tShilvJ3EHA.4068@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl...
> Hi Christian,
>
> Yes, There is a HUGE difference between the two. Best practice for
> interop
> calls for using Document Literal. From what I can see, the packet being
> sent back is encoded properly by the .NET code. It is entirely possible
> that the java code is looking for specific XML - which is not a
> requirement
> in RPC encoded since only the ID/IDREF pairs need to match. What toos
> where the Java side written with?
>
> Regards
>
> Dan
> --------------------
> From: "Christian Wilhelm" <ch.wilhelm@bigfoot.de>
> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.webservices
> Subject: Re: Calling Java WebService from .net Client
> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:12:36 +0100
> Lines: 171
> Message-ID: <31l6vnF3d1pelU1@individual.net>
> References: <31b4qnF37kjngU1@individual.net>
> <R0fDycX2EHA.1512@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl> <31inifF3afm0lU1@individual.net>
> <qkQS1j92EHA.4068@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl>
> X-Trace: individual.net bsvx72DpLwnuiM9G2gx5zwmTMNuTCqkrEZKT5M/IzkM22CA4Y=
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
> Path:
> cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.s
> ul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!in
> dividual.net!not-for-mail
> Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl
> microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.webservices:7935
> X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.webservices
>
> Hi Dan,
>
>> Any chance you can set these to document literal form?
> Do I have to set this up in my .net-Client or on the Java-WebServer?
> How can I set it up?
> And what is the main differenz between literal and rpc?
>
> Thank you very much,
> Christian
>
> "Dan Rogers" <danro@microsoft.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:qkQS1j92EHA.4068@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl...
>> I'm reminded why I dislike soap encoding so much.
>>
>> Any chance you can set these to document literal form? It gets SO much
>> easier.
>> --------------------
>> From: "Christian Wilhelm" <ch.wilhelm@bigfoot.de>
>> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.webservices
>> Subject: Re: Calling Java WebService from .net Client
>> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:37:23 +0100
>> Lines: 122
>> Message-ID: <31inifF3afm0lU1@individual.net>
>> References: <31b4qnF37kjngU1@individual.net>
>> <R0fDycX2EHA.1512@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl>
>> X-Trace: individual.net
>> WxJre0nv4n+pgo5h6BaTgQUBGnF+5NwvokWBV8glf3mLBAiFI=
>> X-Priority: 3
>> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
>> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
>> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
>> Path:
>>
> cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTFEED01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.s
>>
> ul.t-online.de!t-online.de!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berli
>> n.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
>> Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl
>> microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.webservices:7885
>> X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.webservices
>>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> thank you very much for your response!
>>
>>> type ArrayOfParameter rather than a Parameter array
>> Yes, we have tried this, too. But at the end there will be a Parameter[]
>> at
>> all. Our class looked like this:
>>
>> public class ParameterList
>> {
>> public Parameter[] paramArray;
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> Doesn't work...
>>
>>> Second, have you compared a wire trace of the SOAP packet
>> Yes, of course, we have. The difference between the two Requests is shown
>> in
>> the following snippets (transporting a ParameterList with one Parameter
>> in
>> it). Have a look at how the "ParameterList" is being transported. Can you
>> give me some further advice, please?
>>
>> Thank you very much,
>> Christian
>>
>> === Request of JavaClient (works) ==============================
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> <soapenv:Envelope
>> xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
>> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
>> <soapenv:Body>
>>
>> <ns1:invokeThirdParty
>> soapenv:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
>> xmlns:ns1="http://beans.middleware.cat.company.de">
>> <targetUrl
>>
> xsi:type="xsd:string">http://lxdev81.int.cinetic.de:8353/userdaten
>> l>
>> <functionName xsi:type="xsd:string">getIdentDataById</functionName>
>> <systemName xsi:type="xsd:string" xsi:nil="true"/>
>> <parameterList href="#id0"/>
>> </ns1:invokeThirdParty>
>>
>> <multiRef id="id0" soapenc:root="0"
>> soapenv:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
>> xsi:type="ns2:ParameterList"
>> xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
>> xmlns:ns2="http://beans.middleware.cat.company.de">
>> <parameterItems xsi:type="soapenc:Array"
>> soapenc:arrayType="ns2:Parameter[1]">
>> <item href="#id1"/>
>> </parameterItems>
>> </multiRef>
>>
>> <multiRef id="id1" soapenc:root="0"
>> soapenv:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
>> xsi:type="ns3:Parameter"
>> xmlns:ns3="http://beans.middleware.cat.company.de"
>> xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
>> <name xsi:type="xsd:string">UserID</name>
>> <parameterValue xsi:type="xsd:int">500004136</parameterValue>
>> </multiRef>
>>
>> </soapenv:Body>
>> </soapenv:Envelope>
>> =======================================================
>>
>>
>> === Request of .net Client (doesn't work) ==========================
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
>> <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
>> xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
>> xmlns:tns="http://beans.middleware.cat.company.de"
>> xmlns:types="http://beans.middleware.cat.company.de/encodedTypes"
>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
>> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
>> <soap:Body
>> soap:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
>>
>> <tns:invokeThirdParty>
>> <targetUrl
>>
> xsi:type="xsd:string">http://lxdev81.int.cinetic.de:8353/userdaten
>> l>
>> <functionName xsi:type="xsd:string">getIdentDataById</functionName>
>> <systemName xsi:type="xsd:string" xsi:nil="true"/>
>> <parameterList href="#id1" />
>> </tns:invokeThirdParty>
>>
>> <tns:ParameterList id="id1" xsi:type="tns:ParameterList">
>> <parameterItems href="#id2" />
>> </tns:ParameterList>
>>
>> <soapenc:Array id="id2" soapenc:arrayType="tns:Parameter[1]">
>> <Item href="#id3" />
>> </soapenc:Array>
>>
>> <tns:Parameter id="id3" xsi:type="tns:Parameter">
>> <name xsi:type="xsd:string">UserID</name>
>> <parameterValue xsi:type="xsd:int">500004136</parameterValue>
>> </tns:Parameter>
>>
>> </soap:Body>
>> </soap:Envelope>
>> =======================================================
>>
>>
>> "Dan Rogers" <danro@microsoft.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>> news:R0fDycX2EHA.1512@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl...
>>> Hi Christian,
>>>
>>> I have two thoughts. Looking quickly at this WSDL, have you tried
>>> passing
>>> the type ArrayOfParameter rather than a Parameter array?
>>>
>>> Second, have you compared a wire trace of the SOAP packet to see the
>>> difference between the two requests? I suspect that my first suggestion
>>> is
>>> what the Java clients are passing. This isn't an array, but is a type
>>> unto
>>> itself that happens to contain an array of other types.
>>>
>>> I hope this helps
>>>
>>> Dan Rogers
>>> Microsoft Corporation
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: generic names
    ... Of Selby town council by any chance? ... In fact I changed the lady's Christian name. ... I would suggest Cllr Mrs Jennifer Shaw-Wright is more deserving of our ...
    (uk.tech.digital-tv)
  • Re: The Religion of Peace and family togetherness
    ... On Dec 10, 3:47 pm, Dan S. ... The word death is used as much in the Koran as the word love is used in ... Have you ever read the Quran? ... Kinda like saying the US is a "christian nation". ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: Oh, Lord, Please Dont Let Me Be Misunderstood
    ... not some great Christian vision of ... she obviously hadn't listened to the lyrics. ... But one day Dan, ... Never fails to test the spot, ...
    (rec.music.beatles)
  • Re: "My sheep hear my voice. I know them, and they follow me."
    ... So after they have been judged they will have another chance? ... I value the gospel of Christ so highly that I do not limit its value. ... You know more of the love of God than the greatest of the OT prophets. ... Christian era. ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: I walk in to a titty bar
    ... Me, so to speak. ... If you've EVER gone to a titty bar, you know that this kind of thing ... Dan S. ... I thot you were part of the christian right. ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)