Re: Storage of Client Certificates
- From: "Pablo Cibraro" <pcibraro@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:26:12 -0300
No, only if you identitfy your clients through public keys.
In this case, maybe, using a UsernameToken is a better idea. You can use a
UsernameToken to identify clients and a X509 certificate to protect the
messages.
With this solution, your clients must have a public key and you only need a
private key in the server's certificate store.
Regards,
Pablo Cibraro
www.lagash.com
"RobertP" <RobertP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1A8ABB9F-00A4-453A-A156-7D2AFAED2E6E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> If I have 5,000 users of my web service, I need to have 5,000 public keys
> in
> my server's Certificate Store?
.
- References:
- Storage of Client Certificates
- From: RobertP
- Storage of Client Certificates
- Prev by Date: Re: Web Services Enhancements included in .NET 2.0?
- Next by Date: Re: Verifying that a SoapEnvelope has been signed and encrypted
- Previous by thread: Storage of Client Certificates
- Next by thread: Re: Storage of Client Certificates
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|