Exposed Object vs Remoting server
From: news.microsoft.com (xxx_at_xxx.com)
Date: 12/16/04
- Next message: Ken Kolda: "Re: Exposed Object vs Remoting server"
- Previous message: Steve Long: "Re: Unexplained Remoting error"
- Next in thread: Ken Kolda: "Re: Exposed Object vs Remoting server"
- Reply: Ken Kolda: "Re: Exposed Object vs Remoting server"
- Maybe reply: Ken Kolda: "Re: Exposed Object vs Remoting server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:26:49 +0100
Hello!
I have a remoting server which exposes a Singleton object to a client.
The client can call methods on the object without any problem.
Now, I'm trying to let the client modify the exposed object.
My question is: How would the server be able to load the exposed object
an retrieve the value set by the client? I'm asking because there is no
mention of the currently exposed instance of the class in the server code.
Or how do I expose a named instance of an abject to my clients? (having
a named instance would probably solve my problem)
Thanks
- Next message: Ken Kolda: "Re: Exposed Object vs Remoting server"
- Previous message: Steve Long: "Re: Unexplained Remoting error"
- Next in thread: Ken Kolda: "Re: Exposed Object vs Remoting server"
- Reply: Ken Kolda: "Re: Exposed Object vs Remoting server"
- Maybe reply: Ken Kolda: "Re: Exposed Object vs Remoting server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading