Re: what do you think about this...
From: Sunny (sunnyask_at_icebergwireless.com)
Date: 06/28/04
- Next message: Sunny: "Re: Use a struct within a remotingObject"
- Previous message: Sunny: "Re: server calls client, client calls server problem."
- In reply to: Elp: "Re: what do you think about this..."
- Next in thread: Allen Anderson: "Re: what do you think about this..."
- Reply: Allen Anderson: "Re: what do you think about this..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:32:22 -0500
Free is always good :)
but, they have no http, no way to use them behind proxy, etc. so I do
agree with you, for now I do not see any way to not use gc.
Sunny
In article <OEqwKfkWEHA.556@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>,
rockfamily@REMOVEME.hotmail.com says...
>
> "AA" <aa@personal.net.py> wrote in message
> news:udWqFbiWEHA.1764@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > http://www.mailframe.net/Products/PeerChannel.htm
> >
> > Sound interesting no?
>
> Looks like a competitor for Genuine Channels. I think that i actually saw
> this one a while ago. But there are no mention of any price or terms of use.
> Is it free? Open source? And the page says that it requires Windows 2000/XP
> and .NET 1.1. Does it means that Windows 98 and .NET 1.0 are not supported?
> Why not? Any FAQ? Too many unanswered questions. I'll stick with good ol'
> genuine channel for the moment. But if it is free, it may be a very good
> thing for free software developpers who don't want to pay for a
> bidirectionnal channel.
>
>
>
- Next message: Sunny: "Re: Use a struct within a remotingObject"
- Previous message: Sunny: "Re: server calls client, client calls server problem."
- In reply to: Elp: "Re: what do you think about this..."
- Next in thread: Allen Anderson: "Re: what do you think about this..."
- Reply: Allen Anderson: "Re: what do you think about this..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
