Re: Remote on remote
From: Allen Anderson (allen_at_sparkysystems.com)
Date: 02/24/04
- Next message: Allen Anderson: "Re: proxying an object for intersept methods call"
- Previous message: Allen Anderson: "Re: Performance question"
- In reply to: ItsSnowingOutside: "Remote on remote"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:44:21 -0700
if you start from computer A and have a remote object on computer B
that consumes an object on Computer C, then you can't setup that
object in computer A's config file. You can fix this by simply
setting up the correct config file on computer B and loading it
accordingly.
Allen Anderson
http://www.glacialcomponents.com
mailto: allen@put my website url here.com
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 04:26:06 -0800, "ItsSnowingOutside"
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>I am trying to host a remote object that consumes another remoted object.
>
>I am using the RemotingConfiguration.Configure method to setup both configurations and while the first remoting setup succeeds the second one fails. I get no entries from the WellKnownClientTypeEntry method so it seems that the RegisterWellKnownClientType-part of the automatic configuration fails.
>
>I reckon that I could successfully manage to setup both my configurations programmatically if there was a way to get hold of the remoted objects type "Type.GetType(string)" without referencing the assembly.
>
>So:
>* Should it be possible to setup both configurations using configuration files?
>* Is there a way to get hold of the Type without a reference to the remoted assembly (one does not need that if using configuration files).
- Next message: Allen Anderson: "Re: proxying an object for intersept methods call"
- Previous message: Allen Anderson: "Re: Performance question"
- In reply to: ItsSnowingOutside: "Remote on remote"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
