Re: performance of dual core processors for .NET
- From: "Chris Mullins [MVP]" <cmullins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:02:16 -0800
"Phil Wilson" <phil.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
[Using a Dual Core box for Visual Studio]
I've been very happy with my dual-core box running Visual Studio. The build
process on my machine has increased dramatically, as Visual Studio is pretty
smart about doing builds.
The solutions I work in have 40 or so projects in them, and build time is a
real issue.
My workstation was an $800 box from Dell - (Dimension C521). It's a dual
core AMD machine with 4GB of memory running Windows XP Pro x64. For the
price, it's a fantastic machine. The on-board video card is able to drive my
24" LCD (1900x1280), although I think I'm going to go get a dual DVI card
here shortly.
If you were REALLY paranoid about performance, disk I/O is probably the
biggest bottleneck on my system in terms of build time. I've got a low-end
7200 RPM SATA drive (that came with the machine). Upgrading this to a SATA
raid array, or the new 15k RPM Serial SCSI stuff would be.... fast.
--
Chris Mullins, MCSD.NET, MCPD:Enterprise, MVP C#
http://www.coversant.net/blogs/cmullins
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: performance of dual core processors for .NET
- From: Phil Wilson
- Re: performance of dual core processors for .NET
- References:
- Re: performance of dual core processors for .NET
- From: Phil Wilson
- Re: performance of dual core processors for .NET
- Prev by Date: Re: performance of dual core processors for .NET
- Next by Date: Re: performance of dual core processors for .NET
- Previous by thread: Re: performance of dual core processors for .NET
- Next by thread: Re: performance of dual core processors for .NET
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading