Re: # of current physical Threads > 4 000 000 0000
- From: "Shawn B." <leabre@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:24:44 -0800
usually, performance counters are used with Increment() and Decrement()
call, not by setting the counter to its actual value.
So I guess, there were three more decrements than increments here...
If that's the case, then there's a thread/memory leak. With that many
threads/locks, I suspect the machine is very slow and non - responsive. If
it is fast and very responsive, then the number simply means that the
decrement wasn't called the same number of times as increment or that it is
the wrong performance counter.
Thanks,
Shawn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: # of current physical Threads > 4 000 000 0000
- From: nicknux
- Re: # of current physical Threads > 4 000 000 0000
- References:
- Re: # of current physical Threads > 4 000 000 0000
- From: Gabriel Lozano-Morán
- Re: # of current physical Threads > 4 000 000 0000
- From: Henning Krause [MVP - Exchange]
- Re: # of current physical Threads > 4 000 000 0000
- Prev by Date: Re: C# System.String Memory Usage
- Next by Date: Re: C# System.String Memory Usage [TCP IP Connections]
- Previous by thread: Re: # of current physical Threads > 4 000 000 0000
- Next by thread: Re: # of current physical Threads > 4 000 000 0000
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading