Re: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??
From: CMM (CMM_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/10/05
- Next message: CMM: "Re: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??"
- Previous message: Don: "RE: Single Instance Performance Counter"
- In reply to: Joe: "Re: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??"
- Next in thread: Vyacheslav Lanovets: "Re: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:37:03 -0800
And the VB4/5/6 runtimes were humongous and downright prohibitive compared to
the VB3 runtime (200k and side-by-side capable to boot!). Don't even get me
started on MFC.
Your point is without insight.
"Joe" wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 07:21:47 +0200, "Sean Hederman"
> <usemy@blogentry.com> wrote:
> >The Framework is not 100MB. The install is 25MB and once installed they're
> >about 65 MB I believe.
>
> Thanks for the correction. But still, it's _humongous_ compared to the
> VB or Delphi runtimes.
>
> >Our figures indicate that our developer productivity has gone up by 50%
> >since switching to .NET.
>
> Right, something VB and Delphi users have know all alolong :-)
>
> Joe.
>
- Next message: CMM: "Re: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??"
- Previous message: Don: "RE: Single Instance Performance Counter"
- In reply to: Joe: "Re: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??"
- Next in thread: Vyacheslav Lanovets: "Re: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|