Re: Graphics.ScaleTransform vs. Graphics.Transform.Scale
From: cody (please_dont.spam.deutronium_at_gmx.de)
Date: 03/14/04
- Next message: cody: "Re: Rotating an image"
- Previous message: Andrew Schmidt: "Need Custom PrinterResolution Help"
- In reply to: Bob Powell [MVP]: "Re: Graphics.ScaleTransform vs. Graphics.Transform.Scale"
- Next in thread: Andrew S \(Infragistics\): "Re: Graphics.ScaleTransform vs. Graphics.Transform.Scale"
- Reply: Andrew S \(Infragistics\): "Re: Graphics.ScaleTransform vs. Graphics.Transform.Scale"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:52:16 +0100
> > What is the difference?
>
> There isn't. It's two methods of doing the same thing.
Thanks. Thats somewhat stupid. I do not see any sense why they did it this
way.
They wanted make things easier but they made them more complicated.
And that in an OOP Framework! All matrix methods belongs to the matrix class
and not to the graphics class!
-- cody [Freeware, Games and Humor] www.deutronium.de.vu || www.deutronium.tk
- Next message: cody: "Re: Rotating an image"
- Previous message: Andrew Schmidt: "Need Custom PrinterResolution Help"
- In reply to: Bob Powell [MVP]: "Re: Graphics.ScaleTransform vs. Graphics.Transform.Scale"
- Next in thread: Andrew S \(Infragistics\): "Re: Graphics.ScaleTransform vs. Graphics.Transform.Scale"
- Reply: Andrew S \(Infragistics\): "Re: Graphics.ScaleTransform vs. Graphics.Transform.Scale"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]