Re: supressing keypresses
- From: "Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]" <ptobey no spam AT no instrument no spam DOT com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 15:37:13 -0700
Good luck!
Paul T.
"farseer" <farseer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1128549299.216856.56860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> thanks...well, so you don't think i am a lazy bum, i did look, but may
> have not read it carefully...i thought that not callingnexthookex would
> simply not pass it on to other hookprocs (i.e. other applications that
> have installed WH_KEYBOARD_LL).
> i now see the last four words of the paragraph of interest..."..or the
> target window procedure". i am hoping that means what i think it
> does...
> i'll try tonight...
>
> thanks much
>
.
- References:
- Re: supressing keypresses
- From: Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]
- Re: supressing keypresses
- From: farseer
- Re: supressing keypresses
- From: Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]
- Re: supressing keypresses
- From: farseer
- Re: supressing keypresses
- Prev by Date: Re: Finding handle of control in another process
- Next by Date: Re: Finding handle of control in another process
- Previous by thread: Re: supressing keypresses
- Next by thread: Re: Custom File Types
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading