Re: SQL Server CE vs. DataTable
- From: "Ginny Caughey [MVP]" <ginny.caughey.online@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:00:50 -0400
If you truly don't care if you lose the data if your app ends or the device
gets reset, then there's no need to store it elsewhere, but are you really,
really sure you don't care?
Ginny Caughey
..NET Compact Framework MVP
"blue_nirvana" <bluenirvana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:409647D1-0A0B-43D0-A883-05A597113495@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Is there any benefit of using SQL Server CE for data storage rather than
> simply using a dataset? I'm simply getting some data from a SQL Server
> and
> will be using this data to verify data that will be scanned with the
> wireless
> scanner. I'm thinking that since I do not care if the data is lost if the
> program is terminated, then I do not need to keep it in SQL Server CE and
> can
> easily use a dataset. Is this an OK way of doing this?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SQL Server CE vs. DataTable
- From: Shloma Baum
- Re: SQL Server CE vs. DataTable
- Prev by Date: Re: DeviceID is a bit long
- Next by Date: Re: Setting time in .net 2.0
- Previous by thread: how do i use the sql mobile resultsetview to set column names for a bound data grid?
- Next by thread: Re: SQL Server CE vs. DataTable
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|