Re: Why not barrage of security updates for WM 2003 OS
- From: "Harry Simpson" <hssimpson@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:08:36 -0500
Steve,
I'm all for the truth - but i did send my answer yesterday afternoon before
your addition....
Thanks
Harry
"Steve Maillet (eMVP)" <nospam1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OdN0r$bqFHA.2880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Well there's the fact that Windows Mobile 2003 devices are effectively
> unsecured devices in the first place. Any application can call
> SetKMode(TRUE) and SetProcPermissions(0xFFFFFFFF) and party on. But you
> probably don't want to tell your client that, eh?
>
> --
> Steve Maillet
> EmbeddedFusion
> www.EmbeddedFusion.com
> smaillet at EmbeddedFusion dot com
>
>
.
- References:
- Why not barrage of security updates for WM 2003 OS
- From: Harry Simpson
- Re: Why not barrage of security updates for WM 2003 OS
- From: Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]
- Re: Why not barrage of security updates for WM 2003 OS
- From: Steve Maillet \(eMVP\)
- Why not barrage of security updates for WM 2003 OS
- Prev by Date: Re: Select in large Tables
- Next by Date: Vague SQL problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Why not barrage of security updates for WM 2003 OS
- Next by thread: Apps For Creating Help Files?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|