Re: volonteers wanted

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Christof Lambrecht (ChristofLambrecht_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 11/27/04


Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 11:09:04 -0800

Hy Eric,
thanx for the info,
I'm not a professional but I have not realy a deadline. for the moment our
software runs on Psion series 3 but one day we'll heve to make the move, and
I want to be ready for it, ... learning something new is not the problem.
Since the device is an embedded one, it's difficult to choose a program
language.
NsBasic applications could not be started on the device, some files on the
device were missing ...
That's the reason why I'm asking someone to drop some components on a form
to see what will be running, this could even be a 'Hello world'.

thanx any way,
I'll take a look at the links
Bye,

"Eric" wrote:

> Hello Christof,
>
> > I want to explore if it is possible to write my own data
> > collecting routines. Normaly I should do this in Delphi but Delphi
> > does not support CF.
>
> I'm also a Delphi programmer, but I've recently migrated to C# because it is more popular.
>
> > I've tried some demo's from NSBasic, Creativity Corp, &
> > SywareCe, but some didn't run on my device, while others that do run
> > don't give me full control on form layout or input-checking.
>
> NSBasic is a great choice. This is one of the best development tools for someone who doesn't have a lot of low level experience.
>
> I think Microsoft's free eVB compiler might also be a good choice, but this has a bigger learning curve than NSBasic.
>
> VB.NET or C# would be great choices if you don't mind a big learning curve. These are already quite popular, and are gaining ground daily. If you are a professional software developer, then this is your best bet. You need to change with the times if you do this for a living. It's not the easiest approach, but it is the most "future proof" approach.
>
> > I'm looking for some people that will write some simple code (an edit
> > , some buttons, dropdown, radiobox) in MS VB to check if I can get it running
> > on the device, this way I can check what I 'll need and what it will cost me
> > to write my own apllications.
>
> I doubt if anyone will write you some free code, especially since you'll have to write your own programs eventually anyway.
>
> And eVB is free, so that might be your best choice - just download it and start learning it.
>
> http://www.devbuzz.com/content/installing_emb_vis_tools_pg1.asp
>
> Lots of tutorial info for eVB:
> http://www.devbuzz.com/content/init_starting_out.asp
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Would I buy Delphi 8 ?
    ... >> Make the case for the ease of migration to .Net of existing Delphi ... > But I don't think learning the language is the big step. ... > We will not migrate existing win32 frontend applications to dot.net ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Is delphi a good introduction to programming?
    ... and no problem using objects in Delphi. ... >And it's that learning curve's steepness that will put him off. ... >that you need to write 40 event handlers that are all almost identical, ... When teaching Simula, learning DEC10 SOS ...
    (comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc)
  • Re: Comparisons of D8 with C#/VS.NET ?
    ... but does anyone have links to comparisons of Delphi 8 ... and get going and using the .net framework, but learning all the ... The remobjects one will, I believe, also be usable in VS.NET. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Advantages of Delphi.NET
    ... Without learning a single new thing about .NET. ... This is a huge selling point for Delphi for .NET. ... If you have half your clients on Win32 and the other half moving to .NET ... not point in trying to make your app straddle the Win32 and .NET platform. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: volonteers wanted
    ... Normaly I should do this in Delphi but Delphi ... I'm also a Delphi programmer, but I've recently migrated to C# because it is more popular. ... I think Microsoft's free eVB compiler might also be a good choice, but this has a bigger learning curve than NSBasic. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.compactframework)