Re: Compact .NET & database?
From: Ginny Caughey [MVP] (ginny.caughey.online_at_wasteworks.com)
Date: 06/22/04
- Next message: Philippe Bertrand: "Re: What annoys you about VS.NET 2003 IDE & CF?"
- Previous message: Jay: "Re: Compact .NET & database?"
- In reply to: Jamie Macleod: "Re: Compact .NET & database?"
- Next in thread: Joe Keller: "Re: Compact .NET & database?"
- Reply: Joe Keller: "Re: Compact .NET & database?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:42:19 -0400
Thanks, Jamie. That sounds like a nice enhancement. I'll check it out.
-- Ginny Caughey .Net Compact Framework MVP Have an opinion on the effectiveness of Microsoft Embedded newsgroups? Let Microsoft know! https://www.windowsembeddedeval.com/community/newsgroups "Jamie Macleod" <bubamacleod@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:eQVkjQGWEHA.3492@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > Hi Ginny, > > For those interested, I changed the CSVDataAdapter to allow for another > header line. The second line contains the data type of each column. I > changed the namespace so it wouldn't conflict with the original version. > It's not well tested, but I am using it with no problem so far. > > http://www3.telus.net/spaw/dotnet/SouthpawCSVDataAdapter.zip > > Jamie > > "Ginny Caughey [MVP]" <ginny.caughey.online@wasteworks.com> wrote in message > news:uDjojwEWEHA.2844@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > Hi Jamie, > > > > No I'd also use CSV rather than XML since it is quite a bit faster and > just > > as easy to use with the OpenNetCF.org data adapter. > > > > -- > > Ginny Caughey > > .Net Compact Framework MVP > > > > Have an opinion on the effectiveness of Microsoft Embedded newsgroups? > > Let Microsoft know! > > https://www.windowsembeddedeval.com/community/newsgroups > > > > > > > > "Jamie Macleod" <bubamacleod@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:eOKJ4nAWEHA.1952@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > > Would you use XML over CSV text files? I find CSV files really fast and > > > they don't have all the tags so they are smaller. > > > > > > Jamie > > > "Ginny Caughey [MVP]" <ginny.caughey.online@wasteworks.com> wrote in > > message > > > news:uJmKQh8VEHA.2840@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > > > Jan, > > > > > > > > There is no charge for SqlCe. If the SqlCe database connects to a > > > SqlServer > > > > database, then you need CALs (or per-processor licensing) for the > > > SqlServer > > > > however. > > > > > > > > But if the amount of data is tiny, XML might be almost as easy to work > > > with > > > > since it's easy to read/write to a DataSet. I'd suggest making little > > > tests > > > > with both approaches and see which you like better. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Ginny Caughey > > > > .Net Compact Framework MVP > > > > > > > > Have an opinion on the effectiveness of Microsoft Embedded newsgroups? > > > > Let Microsoft know! > > > > https://www.windowsembeddedeval.com/community/newsgroups > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Jan Hančič" <cwizo@3delavnica.com> wrote in message > > > > news:uQDGVZ8VEHA.2972@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > > > > The amount of data won't be big, and I know that working with a > > database > > > > > would be sooo much easier, but I woudl have to pay for SQLCE ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lp > > > > > > > > > > Ginny Caughey [MVP] wrote: > > > > > > Jan, > > > > > > > > > > > > Unless the amount of data you will be working with is very small, > I > > > > would > > > > > > definitely recommend SqlCe instead of XML. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Next message: Philippe Bertrand: "Re: What annoys you about VS.NET 2003 IDE & CF?"
- Previous message: Jay: "Re: Compact .NET & database?"
- In reply to: Jamie Macleod: "Re: Compact .NET & database?"
- Next in thread: Joe Keller: "Re: Compact .NET & database?"
- Reply: Joe Keller: "Re: Compact .NET & database?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|