Re: Parameter metadata
From: Michael Sparks (michael.sparks_at_remove.this.sbcglobal.net)
Date: 04/30/04
- Next message: Tyson Brown: "Re: Design Advice to avoid Gen 2 collections"
- Previous message: Al Ponomarev: "Re: COM -> CSharp Interface generator"
- In reply to: Brian Tyler: "Re: Parameter metadata"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 23:37:00 GMT
"Brian Tyler" <brianmtyler@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eaiSoYvLEHA.3216@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> The difference is for the automatic marshaller (PInvoke, COM Interop,
etc.).
> The signature contains all that is needed by the CLR to make method calls
> (whether it is by ref or not).
Ah, that is what I was missing - the runtime doesn't care about the
difference.
I was assuming verification guaranteed that a program couldn't use
uninitialized data.
Mike
- Next message: Tyson Brown: "Re: Design Advice to avoid Gen 2 collections"
- Previous message: Al Ponomarev: "Re: COM -> CSharp Interface generator"
- In reply to: Brian Tyler: "Re: Parameter metadata"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|