Re: Anything Wrong With "preloading" Assemblies?
- From: "Robert Cramer" <A@xxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 08:39:29 -0700
<snip>
RE:
<< The only thing to discuss is the preload instead of load on demand. But
that depends on your specific architecture >>
In my case I have a few HTTP handlers per Web site that are not traditional
..ASPX pages (they don't even inherit Page). It is the selection of the
particular subset of special handlers [to load for a given site] that I
would like to perform during Application_Start. For me this selection is the
primary motivation. I have to do it somewhere and would prefer to NOT run
that logic potentially many times, which would be the case if I were to go
with a load-as-needed implementation. The performance of having them pre
loaded is of secondary importance, although it's certainly a benefit.
-RC
.
- References:
- Anything Wrong With "preloading" Assemblies?
- From: Robert Cramer
- Re: Anything Wrong With "preloading" Assemblies?
- From: Holger Kreissl
- Anything Wrong With "preloading" Assemblies?
- Prev by Date: AK Anne Klein Women's Two-Tone Bracelet watch #6777SVTT - Replica Watch Fake
- Next by Date: Re: Returning Nothing from Function
- Previous by thread: Re: Anything Wrong With "preloading" Assemblies?
- Next by thread: Re: Anything Wrong With "preloading" Assemblies?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|