Re: asp.net performance

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance


<laziers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:050b3da5-830f-4c8b-8fed-ce61e54f54c1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 17 Gru, 18:46, Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]
<pbromb...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Where did you get this FUD info? ASP.NET combined with MS SQL Server is
about
the fastest combo around. Big sites will millions of users are written
with
these.

hmm asp.net ok is very very fast, but ms sql? :I i saw the tests on
the internet
with mysql, and the mysql was faster :I I know the case of a big site
where developers
wanted to move from php+mysql to asp.net mssql. they do that, they
notice that
the site is much slower :I so they stop migrate to asp.net+mssql.

Hmm in fact this is the reason of my questions and my confuses.


The first thing you have to do is evaluate YOUR needs; never mind the
gazillion claims on the internet; I've seen too many of these discussions
go on for days/weeks and it ends up the OP has such nominal requirements
that almost ANY database would have served them well from a performance
perspective.

There are all kinds of published metrics available, depending upon
configuration and use of the DB ... in any case, the general suggestion that
ASP.NET+MSSQL is slow is just plain silly.

That said, if I had 50 PHP developers coding against MySQL on an established
site I don't think I'd even think about making the move you mention unless I
had a long time to transition and get everyone up to speed; there's a
lock-in and training problem, which you should think about if you're
starting from scratch .. what do your people know? who are you going to be
able to hire in your geographic area?



.

Relevant Pages