Re: Forcing ASP.NET 1.1 isn't working

re:
!> Since the home page (default) was asp (unmanaged code)

I wish you'd mentioned that before.
I could have saved you the support incident.




Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"slolife" <slolife@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1193601075.679842.168100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I ended up calling Microsoft about this as we (ExactBid.com) are going
live with a product in a few days and needed a resolution. Here's the
summary in case anyone else runs into the problem:

Problem
=======
After installing the patch KB928365, 1.1 applications are running in
2.0 framework causing issues in the application

Environment
=========
Windows 2003 - asp.net 1.1 and 2.0

Cause
====
Since the home page (default) was asp (unmanaged code), it loaded 2.0
instead of 1.1

Resolution
========
Raise a get request to an aspx page first during application start
event so that 1.1 is loaded in the process

Code used
=======
<script language="vbscript" runat="server">
Sub Application_OnStart
Dim winhttp
Set winhttp = Server.Createobject("winHTTP.WinHttpRequest.5.1")
winhttp.Open "GET","<http://www.mysite.com/MyApp/dummy.aspx>",
false
winhttp.send()
Set winhttp = nothing
End Sub
</script>

=========

Hope that's helps people. Thanks for you help!



On Oct 25, 3:12 pm, slolife <slol...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Excellent! Thanks Juan.

On Oct 25, 7:24 am, "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Thanks for the detailed report and sleuthing, slolife.
I am escalating this internally and will post back when/if I have an answer.

Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq :http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español :http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================"slolife" <slol...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
messagenews:1193285972.237050.189130@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

A lot of good info here. Thanks Juan!

Unfortunately, it did not work. First of all, uninstalling .NET 2.0
from IIS didn't work. I ran this:
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\aspnet_regiis.exe -u

It said it uninstalled. So I fired up the website and I get an error
that "Network Service does not have write permissions to C:\Windows
\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\Temporary ASP.NET Files". This
continued to happen even after recycling the iis and web services.

Okay, so if .NET 2.0 has been uninstalled from IIS, why does accessing
the website require access to the 2.0 framework directory. Even the
snippet of code on the test page:

.NET Version=<%=System.Environment.Version.ToString()%>

Spits out:
.NET Version=2.0.50727.832

What is going on?

One of the differences we noticed between a server that is working (an
not exhibiting these problems) and one that does have problems, is
that the following patch:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/928365

Is installed on problem servers. Once we uninstall the patch from a
problem server, the problem goes away.

Now I am stumped. The patch seems faulty based on that situation.

Anyone else seen this sort of problem with that patch? Anyone else
have any ideas on how to get the website to stick to 1.1 with the
patch?

On Oct 24, 11:40 am, "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

re:
!> Web.config, like I explained, tries to force 1.1
!> <requiredRuntime version="v1.1.4322"/>
!> <supportedRuntime version="v1.1.4322"/>

That doesn't work for web apps. It only works for Windows Forms.

Have you tried setting the .Net Framework version with aspnet_regiis ?

i.e., open a command window at :
drive:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322

...and issue this command :

aspnet_regiis.exe -s W3SVC/1/ROOT/YourVirtualAppName

Substitute your application's name for YourVirtualAppName.

You could also, temporarily, disable ASP.NET 2.0 if you're not using it.

To do that, open a command window at :
drive:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727

...and issue this command

aspnet_regiis.exe -u

That will completely uninstall the .Net Framework 2.0 ( without removing the files ).

Once you confirm that your site is working with ASP.NET 1.1,
when you're ready to reinstall the .Net Framework 2.0, run :

aspnet_regiis.exe -ir

...from the same directory :
drive:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727

That will re-enable ASP.NET 2.0 without requiring reinstalling the files
( and without reconfiguring any existing apps to run under ASP.NET 2.0 ).

Later, you can choose to configure individual apps to run with ASP.NET 2.0 in the IIS Manager.

Try either method or both...and post back the results.

Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq :http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español :http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================

"slolife" <slol...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1193245676.552418.32480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Let me narrow it down, because I realize my initial description was
long winded:

The asp.net dll is compiled in 1.0, the whole website is marked to run
as 1.1. Nothing is supposed to be 2.0. IIS and the
aspnet_regiis.exe -lk say that all sites and apps are running 1.1.
Web.config, like I explained, tries to force 1.1.

Despite all of that, I have a page with this code in the HTML:

.NET Version=<%=System.Environment.Version.ToString()%>

The page spits out:
.NET Version=2.0.50727.832

Why is it running 2.0?

On Oct 24, 7:05 am, "Norman Yuan" <NoAddr...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
.NET is backward compatible, not forward compatible. So, code written and
compiled on 2.0 will not run on 1.x, just as you see.

"slolife" <slol...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1193202386.931708.112010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I have an W2k3IIS server with .NET 1.1 and 2.0 installed. I have a
website, which I'd like to run as 1.1. So I go to that website/app's
properties, and on the ASP.NET tab, I select 1.1.

I have a test page that triggers an event validation (which is a
feature introduced in 2.0). I hit that test page and the error is
generated. So apparently, the site (or, what it really looks like, is
just the page) is still running in 2.0. So I add the following

The site DOES NOT run in 2.0. It runs in 1.1, so your code developed on 2.0
causes error: 1.1 runtime does not know 2.0 code.
You can do the opposite: developing app with 1.x, and run in with either 1,x
or 2.0 runtime.

startup tag to the web.config in the <configuration> tag:

<configuration>
<startup>
<requiredRuntime version="v1.1.4322"/>
<supportedRuntime version="v1.1.4322"/>
</startup>
...
</configuration>

The page still causes the event validation error (meaning, still
running as .NET 2.0).

So what am I doing wrong here? What do I need to do to get the site/
page to run as 1.1?

NOTE: One of the ways I know the page is running 2.0 is that I can add
the attribute enableEventValidation into the @Page directive and the
page compiler doesn't choke.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Load v1.1 framework for ASP page with v2.0 installed on the same machine
    ... I have already set the .NET version of the Website and only 1.1 apps ... run in the application pool. ... if an ASP page is requested before a ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Converting ASP site to .NET
    ... existing personal website to .NET from classic ASP. ... I'm assuming I want my aspx files in the root of my site in the same ... Previously I had my server set up so that the root folder of my web was ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: Manually Configure site for ASP .NET 2 - Revisited
    ... but with Windows XP x64 Edition. ... Configuring web site http//localhost/DotNetNuke to ASP .NET 2.0 failed. ... devices", I have created a website, but as soon as I carry out the last ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: Programmer reluctant to move to .NET
    ... Aside from other issues that have been addressed nobody said anything -- ... government has gotten serious about compelling website publishers to make ... What benefits could I really expect from moving from ASP to .NET? ... I would like to know what problems/issues are involved in moving from ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: General VBScript Questions
    ... suppose you have a website and need to generate an email whenever ... Is having a VBScript on your website one way to do this? ... but I expect you'd be better off finding an ASP ... in your file and the result will render an html file that is sent to the ...
    (microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript)