Re: ASP .NET 2.0 Unanswered questions...


"Juan T. Llibre" <nomailreplies@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uva%23T$0DIHA.5976@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
re:
!> this clears things up nicely

It doesn't for me. :-(

See my just sent-in reply, where I state that
the app uses both inline and codebehind pages.

I *still* wind up with an assembly for each page, in the ASP.NET temp
files dir,
even though the app uses the single-assembly per project model.

What happens if you build an app. using all code-behind pages and no inline
pages AND you deploy the single IL assembly in the project/bin folder?


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: ASP .NET 2.0 Unanswered questions...
    ... What happens if you build an app. ... I don't know because I seldom use codebehind. ... for the app while using inline code for most of the pages. ... using all code-behind pages and no inline pages AND you deploy the single IL ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: WMV blues
    ... > my app? ... Is it built with the DRM stub library? ... Trim & respond inline (please don't top post or snip everything) ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.directx.video)
  • Re: Free Simple Directshow graph wrapper class
    ... > The main component of that is the library, the remaining app, etc are ... Trim & respond inline (please don't top post or snip everything) ... Prev by Date: ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.directx.video)
  • Using a .SO library with Inline
    ... We have an app that is using Inline C -- but at the moment ... it is linking against a .a library [from a commercial package we ...
    (comp.lang.perl.modules)
  • Re: Effort/Time in migrating 1.1 to 2.0
    ... It was coded poorly and much of the logic reside in the code-behind.. ... we have a mid sized external app using mcms, ... my idea is that upgrading now will ... basically adds support for the 1.x project model. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
Loading