Re: Ignoring the ASP.NET conventions...
- From: "Mark Rae" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:20:14 +0100
"Aidy" <aidy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:MNOdndC99_CUux_bRVnysAA@xxxxxxxxx
If only you spent as much time learning as you did ranting.
This isn't the first person I've encountered who thinks they're a bit of a whizz with "traditional" web development, only to find that ASP.NET and the Framework represents a *huge* learning curve... Most simply knuckle down and get on with it, but occasionally some do give up because it's too hard for them...
The approach is driving me nuts, because of this drag and drop,
wysiwyg
I don't use the drag and drop wysiwyg and I'm sure more regular posters on this site are the same.
I certainly never use it...
Just cos MS give you a tool doesn't mean you *have* to use it.
Indeed. Two areas of functionality in ASP.NET which I *never* use are validation controls (I have my own set of JavaScript validation routines) and SqlDataSource / ObjectDataSource (I have my own lightweight DAL)...
--
http://www.markrae.net
.
- References:
- Ignoring the ASP.NET conventions...
- From: jufemaiz: jc
- Re: Ignoring the ASP.NET conventions...
- From: clintonG
- Re: Ignoring the ASP.NET conventions...
- From: jufemaiz: jc
- Re: Ignoring the ASP.NET conventions...
- From: Aidy
- Ignoring the ASP.NET conventions...
- Prev by Date: Object reference not set to an instance of an object
- Next by Date: ASp.NET app not receiving SQLDependancy notification
- Previous by thread: Re: Ignoring the ASP.NET conventions...
- Next by thread: Re: Ignoring the ASP.NET conventions...
- Index(es):