Re: ASP.NET 2.0 maximum URL length?
- From: "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailreplies@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 00:00:27 -0400
re:
Any ideas?
Fresh out of ideas. Have you posted the question to the IIS 7.0 forums ?
http://forums.iis.net/default.aspx?GroupID=41
All the IIS 7.0 MVPs hang out there.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Vlad Hrybok" <vgribok@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:56AD6E71-D9AF-45F7-BFD0-9402265B6184@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Juan,
thank you for the script. It reported maxUrl set to 4096, not 260.
Regarding difference between the behavior of the HTML URL and ASPX URL, both
were GET requests. I used Fiddler to check whether tweaking headers would
change the outcome, and found that with headers or no headers the result is
the same: HTTP 400 for ASP.NET requests and no "bad request" for HTML
requests. URL and URL only, not type of request or headers, determines
whether I get HTTP 400.
I think these two factors prove conclusively that this is not an IIS
settings limiting the lenght of the URL but some ASP.NET setting, just like I
stated in my initial post. Any ideas?
--
Vlad Hrybok
http://UltiDev.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ASP.NET 2.0 maximum URL length?
- From: Juan T. Llibre
- Re: ASP.NET 2.0 maximum URL length?
- References:
- Re: ASP.NET 2.0 maximum URL length?
- From: Juan T. Llibre
- Re: ASP.NET 2.0 maximum URL length?
- From: Vlad Hrybok
- Re: ASP.NET 2.0 maximum URL length?
- Prev by Date: Re: Page_Load gets called twice
- Next by Date: How to use CSS Control Adapters
- Previous by thread: Re: ASP.NET 2.0 maximum URL length?
- Next by thread: Re: ASP.NET 2.0 maximum URL length?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
