ASP.NET great technology but unaffordable?
- From: Alfred Sehmueller <alfred.sehmueller@xxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Apr 2007 06:09:50 -0700
Hello,
we were in contact with the microsoft licence hotline last week. We
want to build a asp.net application based upon a windows 2003 server
and Microsoft sql-server 2005. It will be a commerical application for
customers. The question was which microsoft licences are required on
the customer site.
The technology: ASP.NET, One central SQL-Server login, internal user
database - no windows authentication.
The answer: Each user needs a Windows 2003 Standard Server CAL or a
External Connector licence (never heard that before). For SQL-Server
each user needs a CAL or the SQL-Server a processor licence
But this means: Never mind how your application is built, for each
little webshop, webboard, etc. hosted on a windows 2003 Standard
server you'll need an unlimited amount of Windows CALs or the external
connector licence.
I was never a friend of Linux & PHP - but how should IIS & ASP.NET
bear up against Linux & PHP then? I guess there are thousands of
illegal web applications when the above definition is true.
Thanks for your reply
Alfred
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ASP.NET great technology but unaffordable?
- From: Cowboy \(Gregory A. Beamer\)
- Re: ASP.NET great technology but unaffordable?
- From: Peter Bradley
- Re: ASP.NET great technology but unaffordable?
- From: Juan T. Llibre
- Re: ASP.NET great technology but unaffordable?
- From: Aidy
- Re: ASP.NET great technology but unaffordable?
- Prev by Date: Themes and Skins Vs Css
- Next by Date: Re: how to deploy aspnet 2.0
- Previous by thread: Themes and Skins Vs Css
- Next by thread: Re: ASP.NET great technology but unaffordable?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading