Re: Poor NG Support....
- From: "JeffP@Work" <jpgmt_at_sbcglobal_dot_net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:53:36 -0700
Dear Marina,
I too don't think that Microsoft (MS) is required to answer posts.
I do think that ALL posts deserve an answer, EVEN IF IT IS A CONFUSING
QUESTION, TOO MUCH OR NOT ENOUGH INFO, WHATEVER.
If a question isn't clear or there are many solutions to a common problem
and it's apparent that the person didn't Ask.com or Google or search the NG
for their answer, they deserve at least that much of a response, it only
takes a moment.
Even when people post to the wrong NG, it only takes a moment to post that
you think their question is not appropriate for a particular NG and maybe
include a suggestion as to a better NG.
The only posts that don't require a response are spam or adverts.
JeffP...
"Marina Levit [MVP]" <someone@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:O$UIxu01GHA.324@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I don't think MS is required to answer the posts, unless the email comes
from an MSDN subscriber (at least this is my recollection).
In general, this is a peer to peer newsgroup, with people just using their
own time to help out. A lot of times posts do not get answered for reasons
having to do with the post (too long, not enough information, doesn't make
sense, question isn't clear).
"JeffP@Work" <jpgmt_at_sbcglobal_dot_net> wrote in message
news:uGZ7Os01GHA.3516@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Is this a holiday week?
There are way too many unanswered posts!
I dont' care if the person asked a dumb or un-comprehensible question,
they deserve a response even if it is to clarify or re-state their
question and offer a suggestion.
Hang in there posters, hopefully our questions will be asnwered.
JeffP....
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Poor NG Support....
- From: Marina Levit [MVP]
- Re: Poor NG Support....
- References:
- Poor NG Support....
- From: JeffP@Work
- Re: Poor NG Support....
- From: Marina Levit [MVP]
- Poor NG Support....
- Prev by Date: Masterpage title
- Next by Date: Re: Overhead converting .htm files to .aspx
- Previous by thread: Re: Poor NG Support....
- Next by thread: Re: Poor NG Support....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
