Re: Threading in ASP.NET (C#)
- From: "Peter Morris [Droopy eyes software]" <pete@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:08:43 +0100
We proposed the same. but the clients want them in same web app
If I want my car painted all I care about is how well it was done, I don't
add clauses like "you must use a paint brush" :-) Page requests should be
served quickly and should *not* take long enough to have the word "minutes"
in the time.
The proper way to achieve this is to have the page register a job for a
worker process to complete. I am curious as to why they believe they want
it done this way. Surely you can convince them to change their minds within
about 30 seconds once you explain the pro/con of each approach?
Pete
.
- References:
- Threading in ASP.NET (C#)
- From: venkat
- Re: Threading in ASP.NET (C#)
- From: Peter Morris [Droopy eyes software]
- Re: Threading in ASP.NET (C#)
- From: venkat
- Threading in ASP.NET (C#)
- Prev by Date: Session Timeout question.
- Next by Date: Re: Commercial use of express edition of VWD possible?
- Previous by thread: Re: Threading in ASP.NET (C#)
- Next by thread: Re: Threading in ASP.NET (C#)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
