RE: Assembly binding problem

Thanks for response Steven,

Yes, I know the exception you mentioned, this is because you're using
<activated> object in your remoting server application, because for
<activated> type remote object, the version is determined by client
side(client side create the instance of which version, then the server
should create the instance of the corresponding version), there is no
needed to specify version info.(and it force us not to specify version in
server application's config file for activated type). However, we can
specify the version info for the activated type object in client
application's application config file, have you tried this?

Regards,

Steven Cheng
Microsoft Online Support

Get Secure! www.microsoft.com/security
(This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no
rights.)

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS
    ... you to specify a different config file ... I want some of this rats nest of processes to use a different name server but not all of them, ... I found it interesting although I haven't had time to give it a try especially since I'm thinking about leaving bind9 for djbdns and ldap2dns even though I've never been crazy about djbdns and family. ...
    (freebsd-net)
  • Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS
    ... to specify a different config file ... I want some of this rats nest of processes to use a different name server but not all of them, ... I would ask the security crew to think about this too as DNS is important to get right for security, ...
    (freebsd-net)
  • Help!!! Config files
    ... I have a business objects dll on my server containing ... I have created a config file to "advertise each of the ... On the client side I have created a config file ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.remoting)
  • Re: Secifying RPC ip address of client
    ... >> the client side in terms of an RPC call? ... Server side", I don't agree that this is the same situation. ... If it has to specify remote addresses, ... it is important to have control over the source address being ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.networks)
  • Re: .Net Remoting impass. Please help!
    ... > "An unhandled exception of type> 'System.Runtime.Serialization.SerializationException' occurred in> mscorlib.dll ... > And here's a copy of the client's config file:> ... Only thing is that I'm passing a> reference of the client to the server object in order to later on be able> to ... the application is running both> the server and the client on the same machine for now so it shouldn't have> anything to do with the network. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)