Re: asp.net 1.1 application on 2.0
- From: "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailreplies@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:57:55 -0400
re:
I have W2K3 machine and on which ASP.NET 1.1 and ASP.NET 2.0 both are installed
you should put all the 1.1 apps in a single IIS Application pool,
and all the 2.0 apps in a different Application Pool.
Yes.
For W2K3, that is a must...at the very least.
Of course, if you have a very critical application, you could place it in an Application Pool
all of its own, and eliminate the chance of your critical application crashing because
another application in the same App Pool crashed the process.
That would be good whether it's a 1.1 app or a 2.0 app,
if you're running W2K3 ( running IIS 6.0 ).
re:
on my application's ASP.NET tab I set ASP.NET version to 2.0
Does this mean that its using now asp.net 2.0
Yes, it does.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]" <pbromberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:71D7C6DA-4D76-4C44-838B-04E79CFFC509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
abcd,
If you want to run both 1.1 and 2.0 ASP.NET applications on the same server,
you should put all the 1.1 apps in a single IIS Application pool, and all the
2.0 apps in a different Application Pool.
Peter
"abcd" wrote:
Juan. Thanks for the detailed post. Its really helpful.
earlier I was doing wrong. I have W2K3 machine and on which ASP.NET 1.1 and
ASP.NET 2.0 both are installed, I was just enabling and disabling the web
service extension for 1.1 and 2.0 each at a time. When I disable 1.1 and
enable 2.0 my applicaiton didnt work.
But as you said when I open IIS manager and on my application's ASP.NET tab
I set ASP.NET version to 2.0 and Web server extension for 1.1 and 2.0 are
set to "Allow" and now my applicaiton works. Does this mean that its using
now asp.net 2.0
Thanks in advance.
Juan T. Llibre wrote:
re:
When I install 2.0 does that install 1.1 also?
No. They are separate installs.
The .Net Framework 1.1 is available here :
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=262D25E3-F589-4842-8157-034D1E7CF3A3&displaylang=en
Note : you should also install the .Net Framework SP1:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=A8F5654F-088E-40B2-BBDB-A83353618B38&displaylang=en
and,. also, install the Security update for 1.1 :
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=8EC6FB8A-29EB-49CF-9DBC-1A0DC2273FF9&displaylang=en
The .Net Framework 2.0 is available here :
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=0856EACB-4362-4B0D-8EDD-AAB15C5E04F5&displaylang=en
re:
how do I test my applicaition so that it will use only 2.0. I want
to test this.
Open the IIS Manager, select the application you want to configure,
and make sure that in its properties, in the ASP.NET tab,
the .Net Framework version you want to target is selected.
I assume you want to target the .Net Framework 2.0.
In that case, the ASP.NET tab for your application's properties,
should have 2.0.50727 as the "ASP.NET Version".
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"abcd" <abcd@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:O9qJGglMGHA.1028@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks.
When I install 2.0 does that install 1.1 also? I have a machine
which has both 1.1 and 2.0, how do I test my applicaition so that it
will use only 2.0. I want to test this. thanks
Juan T. Llibre wrote:
re:
Will my application work on asp.net 2.0 also.
Yes, unless you're calling non-existent classes.
re:
Can I say asp.net 2.0 is supported automatically for the
applications which are written for asp.net 1.1
You can say that ASP.NET 2.0 supports 1.1 applications,
unless you are calling non-existent classes.
In general, though, you should have side-by-side installs of ASP.NET
1.1 and ASP.NET 2.0, and run your applications with a specific .Net
Framework for a target.
Unless you want/need to have a 2.0-only machine, that is the best
configuration.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"abcd" <abcd@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23oS28BlMGHA.2124@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have asp.net application which was tested and developed on
asp.net 1.1. WIll my application work on asp.net 2.0 also. Can I say
asp.net 2.0 is supported automatically for the applications which are
written for asp.net 1.1 thanks
.
- References:
- asp.net 1.1 application on 2.0
- From: abcd
- Re: asp.net 1.1 application on 2.0
- From: Juan T. Llibre
- Re: asp.net 1.1 application on 2.0
- From: abcd
- Re: asp.net 1.1 application on 2.0
- From: Juan T. Llibre
- Re: asp.net 1.1 application on 2.0
- From: abcd
- Re: asp.net 1.1 application on 2.0
- From: Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]
- asp.net 1.1 application on 2.0
- Prev by Date: Re: Even I disable the ViewState property, I still see the hidden field _VIEWSTATE
- Next by Date: Re: Program to Check whether its a file or Directory
- Previous by thread: Re: asp.net 1.1 application on 2.0
- Next by thread: Capture an HTML document as an image
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
