Re: More than One

Hi Thom,

Any further progress on this or does those thing in my last reply also
helps a little?
If still anything else we can help, please feel free to post here.

Regards,

Steven Cheng
Microsoft Online Support

Get Secure! www.microsoft.com/security
(This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no
rights.)
--------------------
| X-Tomcat-ID: 65443529
| References: <#5kAbeNBGHA.1252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<UfT9XnSBGHA.2560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<e1flLyTBGHA.628@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| From: stcheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Steven Cheng[MSFT])
| Organization: Microsoft
| Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 03:39:41 GMT
| Subject: Re: More than One
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| Message-ID: <Q3tMxAeBGHA.2560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| Lines: 209
| Path: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl
| Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:366148
| NNTP-Posting-Host: TOMCATIMPORT1 10.201.218.122
|
| Thanks for your response Thom,
|
| For common ASP.NET web application(1.1 or 2.0), it's still ok that we
| deploy the application by simply copy the page files to the target
virtual
| directory and assemblies to the target bin folder (if strong-named
assembly
| , we need to put them into GAC.....).
|
| I am hoping to have a similar arrangement with 2.0 where there will 32
| subdirectories from the root and each will be a separate customer with
| separate access controls.
| ==============================
| I think it possible, since we can just create 32 separate application
| virtual directory under the root webspace) and each application virtual
| directory can has its own virtual directory based IIS
| setting.....(authentication mode...... )
|
|
|
| One difference that I noticed and am still trying to work through is that
| there is no namespace statement in ASP.NET 2.0 applications and there is
in
| ASP.NET 1.1 applications. Perhaps this is what was providing the nice
| segregation of applications in 1.1?
| ===============================
| No, this won't affect the isolation of each asp.net web application.
| No-namespace in asp.net 2.0 is because all the web page classes
| or source files in (app_code folder) are dynamically compiled at runtime,
| so they will be given a runtime generated internal namespace.... this not
| controled by us. And for each web application,their assemblies will be
| loaded into their own AppDomain so classes in differernt application
won't
| conflict with those in other application.....
|
| Thanks,
|
| Steven Cheng
| Microsoft Online Support
|
| Get Secure! www.microsoft.com/security
| (This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no
| rights.)
|
|
|
| --------------------
| | From: "Thom Little" <thom@xxxxxxxxxx>
| | References: <#5kAbeNBGHA.1252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| <UfT9XnSBGHA.2560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| | Subject: Re: More than One
| | Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 03:08:18 -0500
| | Lines: 149
| | X-Priority: 3
| | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
| | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
| | X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
| | Message-ID: <e1flLyTBGHA.628@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| | NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.99.185.176
| | Path: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl
| | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl
| microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:365884
| | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| |
| | Thank you for the information. I am still working my way through it.
| |
| | In pre-ASP and ASP 3 I worked with a customer by developing a website
on
| my
| | remote space (currently containing my applications and 37 customer
| | applications that have limited access. When the customer is happy with
| the
| | result I simply copy the "space" from my remote server to the root of
| their
| | remote server "webspace" and it is published to the world.
| |
| | I am hoping to have a similar arrangement with 2.0 where there will 32
| | subdirectories from the root and each will be a separate customer with
| | separate access controls.
| |
| | One difference that I noticed and am still trying to work through is
that
| | there is no namespace statement in ASP.NET 2.0 applications and there
is
| in
| | ASP.NET 1.1 applications. Perhaps this is what was providing the nice
| | segregation of applications in 1.1?
| |
| | --
| | -- Thom Little -- www.tlanet.net -- Thom Little Associates, Ltd.
| | --
| |
| | "Steven Cheng[MSFT]" <stcheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| | news:UfT9XnSBGHA.2560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| | > Hi Thom,
| | >
| | > Welcome.
| | > As for ASP.NET 2.0 web application hosting in IIS website, it has the
| same
| | > model as ASP.NET 1.1. Each asp.net web application should reside in a
| | > single virtual directory which is configured as "Application"(have
| | > application name....). And for a single asp.net application, it can
| | > contains other sub dirs(normal virutal dir ,not application dir) which
| | > contains pages or other static resources... , however, all the
| assemblies
| | > should be put in the private "bin" dir of the Application's root
| | > directory(must...).
| | >
| | > Also, when hosting multiple asp.net web application, and those
| | > applications's diretory has sub/children hierarchy, we need to pay
| | > attention for somethings:
| | >
| | > 1. For web.config, each application's runtime configuration
collection
| are
| | > calculated from the whole hierarchy from its own web.config , to sub
| | > virtual dir's web.config or IIS site root's web.config(if exists) and
| | > finally, global web.config(or machine.config....). So if we defined
some
| | > application specific data in the super application's web.config,
it'll
| be
| | > inherited in sub application....
| | >
| | > /siteroot
| | > /bin
| | > page files....
| | > web.config
| | >
| | >
| | > /superwebapp
| | > /bin
| | > super web app pages.....
| | > web.config
| | >
| | >
| | > /sub app
| | > /bin
| | > sub app pages....
| | > web.conifg
| | >
| | >
| | >
| | > 2. For some component (such as http handler or httpModule . or other
| | > assembly related setting ) setting in web.config, it'll require we
| specify
| | > the assembly name.... , in such cases, we need to pay more attention,
| | > since
| | > the sub applcation will inherit these setting, so at runtime, the sub
| | > application will try looking for those assemblies in their own private
| | > "bin" folder rather than super application's "bin" dir, this is a
common
| | > problems ......
| | >
| | > So generally, we suggest deploy separate applications (haven't
| particular
| | > super/children relationship) in separate virtual directory path .....
| | > If we do have to deploy different applications in virtual directorys
| that
| | > have parent/child structure, we need to pay attention to the above
| things
| | > I
| | > mentioned....
| | >
| | > Here are some msdn reference discussing about ASP.NET web
configuration
| | > structure/hierarchy and configuration ASP.NET application in IIS:
| | >
| | > #ASP.NET Configuration File Hierarchy and Inheritance
| | > http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178685.aspx
| | >
| | > #ASP.NET and IIS Configuration
| | > http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178477(en-US,VS.80).aspx
| | >
| | > Hope helps. Thanks,
| | >
| | > Steven Cheng
| | > Microsoft Online Support
| | >
| | > Get Secure! www.microsoft.com/security
| | > (This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no
| | > rights.)
| | >
| | >
| | > --------------------
| | > | From: "Thom Little" <thom@xxxxxxxxxx>
| | > | Subject: More than One
| | > | Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:05:45 -0500
| | > | Lines: 22
| | > | X-Priority: 3
| | > | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| | > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
| | > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
| | > | X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
| | > | Message-ID: <#5kAbeNBGHA.1252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| | > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| | > | NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.99.185.176
| | > | Path:
TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl
| | > | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl
| | > microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:365783
| | > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| | > |
| | > | Visual Studio 2003 / .NET Framework 1.1 I could create multiple web
| | > | applications. In the root of a remote webspace I could have a
single
| | > /bin
| | > | directory and a single web.config file.
| | > |
| | > | I would then FTP (using a third-party FTP program) the .aspx files
in
| | > any
| | > of
| | > | the applications to any directory in the webspace. I would also
FTP
| all
| | > the
| | > | .dll files to the single /bin directory in the root.
| | > |
| | > | Visual Studio 2005 / .NET Framework 2.0 does not seem to support
| | > multiple
| | > | independent applications in the same webspace
| | > |
| | > | How can I publish multiple applications (that are built in separate
| | > | unconnected projects) in the same webspace?
| | > |
| | > | Is there a document that describes this procedure that I can access?
| | > |
| | > | --
| | > | -- Thom Little -- www.tlanet.net -- Thom Little Associates,
Ltd.
| | > | --
| | > |
| | > |
| | > |
| | > |
| | >
| |
| |
| |
|
|

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Forms Authentication
    ... "Hernan de Lahitte" wrote: ... > different applications, you have a SSO scenario with Forms ... >> successfully, when the login page, and the redirect page are in the same ... >> virtual directory, however, I want to put the login page into a separate ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.security)
  • Re: Multiple Subdirectories with different login pages
    ... Yep -- a nested virtual directory under all of your applications' directories mapped to the same physical location works. ... different authentication schemes for the child directories then you'll have to make them applications in IIS. ... Now sites A,B, and C will all have seperate loging forms using ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • VS 2005 and virtual directories
    ... Currently I am using a bunch of aspx pages that are shared among a few ... I am attaching the shared pages as a virtual directory ... application it also loads the virtual directory pages in the same project. ... by a dozen of applications. ...
    (microsoft.public.vsnet.general)
  • Re: Remote connection to the Intranet
    ... How is authentication configured in IIS for the site or virtual directory in ... > I've created several ASP.NET applications for our Intranet. ... when they use AOL or dial-up connection. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.security)
  • Re: How to ask VS.NET not to require vitrual dir for automated builds?
    ... applications run. ... > build runs on a separate server in unattended mode using Visual Studio in ... > there is no matching virtual directory on a build server and build fails. ...
    (microsoft.public.vsnet.general)