Re: Are ASP.NET user interfaces essentially dead now?
- From: "Bruce Barker" <brubar_nospamplease_@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:04:12 -0800
thats MS's hope. there are a couple issues
1) no MS o/s comes with .net installed. its currently an addon (22mb
download)
2) click once is a great way to spead viruses (as the code does not run in a
sandbox), and MS has not tackled the author validation issues.
3) requires ms o/s (apple is still > 6% share)
4) many company firewalls will block click once (maybe even smart clients)
5) click once only supported by IE (<90% share).
6) more personal devices with browsers
with these issues, and ajax getting popular again, browser apps will be
around for a while.
-- bruce (sqlwork.com)
"Rob R. Ainscough" <robains@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23gqpHyB$FHA.140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> VS 2005 I have:
> ClickOnce deployment
> User's that hate and or don't want to use an IE Client (don't blame
> them)
>
> I don't see how ASPX web pages are going to survive? With .NET 2.0 and
> clickonce deployment my app is 427KB (even with modem dialup speed it
> doesn't take long to download) -- the user gets a very friendly secure
> WindowsForm app (most of them don't even notice they're not under IE
> anymore) that performs considerably faster than any ASP.NET app.
>
> The road map as I see it:
> IE client -- back to static just clickonce links that open up
> WindowsForms apps
> Vista -- .NET 2.0 built in (no need to download)
> WebServices -- called from WindowsForms apps (keeps it secure and
> firewall friendly)
> WindowsForms are a HELL of a lot more secure (no IE attached activex
> components, no data miners, click monitors, etc. etc.)
>
> The way I see it -- user interaction is going to move back to WindowsForms
> since the IE client by definition is just NOT user friendly, NOT
> programmer friendly, and has a ton of other issues surrounding it in terms
> of security and performance and flexibility.
>
> Don't get me wrong, web development will still exist (web services and
> basic static content), but I believe anyone doing serious business
> applications using the web will migrate to this approach -- it really is a
> win win.
>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are ASP.NET user interfaces essentially dead now?
- From: Rob R. Ainscough
- Re: Are ASP.NET user interfaces essentially dead now?
- References:
- Are ASP.NET user interfaces essentially dead now?
- From: Rob R. Ainscough
- Are ASP.NET user interfaces essentially dead now?
- Prev by Date: ASP.NET 2.0 Web parts Drag drop Asynchronously
- Next by Date: Re: VB vs C# vs C++ vs J#
- Previous by thread: Re: Are ASP.NET user interfaces essentially dead now?
- Next by thread: Re: Are ASP.NET user interfaces essentially dead now?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading