Re: I won't argue with you all.
- From: "Kevin Spencer" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 17:20:59 -0400
> and secondly, I don't know enough yet.
Indeed you do not. In fact, you don't know enough about the history of this
thread and several others, as well as the nature of ASP.Net to make any
comment or criticsm at all.
> I did not hear even one time a "maybe something's wrong with your config,
> let's see how we can help you".
He didn't ask for help, and he didn't indicate that he had a problem.
Obviously, "maybe something's wrong with your config, let's see how we can
help you" would not be an appropriate response to someone who is not
complaining about having any problem. Refer to my first paragraph.
> you are MS-Protectors. you will defend VisualStudio to the death.
> do you get payed for that ?
Now, who is judging whom based upon what here? First, this thread is not a
discussion regarding Visual Studio.Net, so your criticism is well off the
mark. Second, as you are apparently ignorant of the context of this
discussion, you are in no place to make any judgement about why anyone
participating in this thread is asserting anything. Therefore, you are
ignorantly jumping to conclusions, and making accusations based upon false
information that you manufactured from your own subjective and inaccurate
perception of the situation. That sort of thinking will not help you as a
developer. If you have no aspirations of becoming a developer, you're in the
wrong place.
I have seen all of this thread, as well as all of the related threads, and
all the messages in them. I don't intend to explain the context of this
discussion to you; if you wish, you can read it for yourself. There have
been some rather angry and hot-headed remarks made in this thread, both by
the OP and by those who have responded to him. Now, if you want to complain
about angry and hot-headed remarks, obviously you have a point. However,
these remarks have been confined to a limited number of the participants,
certainly not all of them. Of course, your remarks, while not angry or
hot-headed, are certainly critical and judgmental. So, I suppose that makes
you as human and fallible as those whom you accuse.
--
HTH,
Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
..Net Developer
Neither a follower nor a lender be.
"Dried Cactus" <Dried Cactus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:F5B983E6-BD7C-4514-B346-30787110EA8A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> for once, I don't want to.
> and secondly, I don't know enough yet.
>
> but, and that's important :
> instead of listening to the man, you're jumping on him alltogather.
>
> I did not hear even one time a "maybe something's wrong with your config,
> let's see how we can help you".
>
> nah-ah.
> you are MS-Protectors. you will defend VisualStudio to the death.
> do you get payed for that ?
>
> C'mon !
> the man is saying something does not feel right to him.
> instead of trying to help, you do this ?
>
> Sorry - I must've thought the MS Community would be somewhat different,
> but
> what did I expect ?
>
>
> "Win32, VB, .NET n COM Developer" wrote:
>
>> Why dont you get a real life???
>>
>> First, If you were as good as you said, you should know or infer the
>> inner
>> mechanics of VB6 and those of .NET. By the way, VB6 is out of the window.
>>
>> Bad performance in debbuging time or production just points out some
>> things:
>>
>> 1) You are the typical "Install Windows with wizard": Just next, next
>> ,next
>> whatever the option is.
>>
>> 2) Your knowledge in "ANCIENT" technologies and "State-Of-The-Art"
>> technologies is poor.
>>
>> 3) At least try one of those fast tracks with Paul D. Sheriff. He is good
>> at
>> trainning (as i saw many friends with Sheriff material learning at fast
>> pace).
>>
>> 4) Dont asume everyone has a problem just because you are another
>> VB6-backed
>> programmer. YES! The kind of programmer that was made just using code
>> wizards
>> and searching the web just to do something. The kind of programmer that
>> writes the line but dont understand what the line does exactly at any
>> level.
>>
>> 5) Get a life morooon!!!!
>>
>>
>> "John Rivers" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The Troll wins ... again.
>> >
>> > Microsoft has resolved this issue in VS.NET 2005
>> >
>> > they saw it as a major hurdle to PRODUCTIVENESS
>> >
>> > and fixed it by splitting up the single assembly created by VS.NET 2003
>> > into many smaller ones
>> >
>> > they have managed to decrease the recompilation time to under 2 seconds
>> > and the detach time is instantaneous
>> > and removed the requirement to detach before editing
>> >
>> > but, of course, all the people who responded to my original post
>> > argumentatively will *not* be using these features.
>> >
>> > For them I have written a special adapter that SLOWS DOWN the
>> > development process in VS.NET 2005 this will help them to avoid being
>> > hypocrites.
>> >
>> > To obtain your copy, just reply to this post with subject "I am a
>> > nincompoop"
>> >
>> >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- You know what ? I agree. and I apologize.
- From: Dried Cactus
- You know what ? I agree. and I apologize.
- References:
- Re: VS.NET is 10 times slower than VB6
- From: John Rivers
- Re: VS.NET is 10 times slower than VB6
- From: Win32, VB, .NET n COM Developer
- I won't argue with you all.
- From: Dried Cactus
- Re: VS.NET is 10 times slower than VB6
- Prev by Date: Re: Listbox containing duplicate items - correct selection not maintained on postback?
- Next by Date: Problem publishng a web site
- Previous by thread: I won't argue with you all.
- Next by thread: You know what ? I agree. and I apologize.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
