Re: VS.NET is 10 times slower than VB6
- From: "John Rivers" <first10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Sep 2005 15:16:36 -0700
The Troll wins ... again.
Microsoft has resolved this issue in VS.NET 2005
they saw it as a major hurdle to PRODUCTIVENESS
and fixed it by splitting up the single assembly created by VS.NET 2003
into many smaller ones
they have managed to decrease the recompilation time to under 2 seconds
and the detach time is instantaneous
and removed the requirement to detach before editing
but, of course, all the people who responded to my original post
argumentatively will *not* be using these features.
For them I have written a special adapter that SLOWS DOWN the
development process in VS.NET 2005 this will help them to avoid being
hypocrites.
To obtain your copy, just reply to this post with subject "I am a
nincompoop"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: VS.NET is 10 times slower than VB6
- From: Win32, VB, .NET n COM Developer
- Re: VS.NET is 10 times slower than VB6
- From: Bob Lehmann
- Re: VS.NET is 10 times slower than VB6
- Prev by Date: Re: pass dynamic variable to user controls
- Next by Date: Re: Posting values between pages
- Previous by thread: RE: VS.NET is 10 times slower than VB6
- Next by thread: Re: VS.NET is 10 times slower than VB6
- Index(es):