Re: VS.NET is 10 times slower than VB6

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

re:
> in my experience if a computer is at 100% cpu for 6 seconds just to
> output "hello world" to a browser something is very wrong indeed

So, now you weren't "debugging" ? You were outputting "hello world" ?

Your original post stated that :

> It takes around 6 seconds to start debugging a very simple ASPX page
> with VS.NET whereas VB6 takes under 0.5 seconds, even with
> very large and complex projects.

Which one was it ?
Were you "debugging" or were you outputting "hello world" ?

Liars need to have a good memory, if their lies are going to be believed.

Here's a page that demonstrates that you are lying through your teeth :

http://asp.net.do/test/helloworld.aspx

That page has a button, a label, a textbox and one click event procedure.

I added two Trace.Write statements at "Begin PreInit" and "End Render".

Click on the link above, and see how long it took
for ASP.NET to process and render helloworld.aspx.

Hint : it's about 1.5 milliseconds, not 6 seconds as you claim.

You are a lying troll!



Juan T. Llibre
ASP.NET MVP
http://asp.net.do/foros/
Foros de ASP.NET en Español
Ven, y hablemos de ASP.NET...
======================

"John Rivers" <first10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1124842485.123817.171430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> interesting logic
> i should be paid less if i question
> the bad performance of vs.net ide?
>
> so if you pick up your new car
> and it does 0-60mph in 45 seconds
> whilst red lining at 7000rpm
> you wouldn't question that?
>
> in my experience if a computer is
> at 100% cpu for 6 seconds just to
> output "hello world" to a browser
> something is very wrong indeed
>
> i wouldn't be confident to use
> such a system if my living depended on it
> would you?
>
> especially when you have a vb6 based system
> that has run quickly and bug free for 3 years
> why would you switch to such a system?
>
> as most experienced developers will agree
> there is more value in easy to maintain
> code (and that includes a good ide) than
> raw performance
>
> especially when the bottleneck in most
> applications isn't the runtime - it is
> usually something else
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Desktop running XP Home Edition taking 30 minutes to boot
    ... You have hardware problems on your controller. ... You can remove unnecessary devices from the IDE chain and see if things improve, adding them one at a time thereafter will help finding the culprit. ... I looked at the event log and found the following warnings and errors ... The browser was unable to retrieve a list of servers from ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • RE: A comment on using CPU resources
    ... Would it be possible to mask or disguise firefox to appear to be closed ... stealing CPU cycles this way is known for some ... As long as any script is running, the browser shows that the page ... page or the user might simply cancel loading (ie the java script). ...
    (Bugtraq)
  • Re: cannot install fc7, fc6, or fc5 on new machine
    ... I managed to update the BIOS (which was several revs old - ver 0502 ... CPU Frequency ... Default value is 'IDE Controller', other options are 'AHCI ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Scheduler fails to allow for "niceness" with new/fast processes
    ... Performing low priority ... rebuilds of various packages (Gentoo packages, ... Now is my top priority -- I want my active browser to get all of ... the CPU if it requires it (fast window/tab opens, ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Xorg at 100%CPU when browser is on
    ... After a while when the browser is launched with ~10 tabs open, ... Xorg then stays at 100% CPU, and it is impossible to kill it, ... Module class: X.Org Video Driver ...
    (freebsd-questions)