Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- From: "Kevin Spencer" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:17:26 -0400
> Too bad it hasn't added alreadey generics.
..Net Platform 2.0
> Because whithout Mono, .NET wouldn't last. I am using Linux and I know
> what
> I'm talkong about.
Odd. I thought Windows was the most prevalent platform in the world.
Remember, .Net and Java are NOT just for servers. But I don't use Linux, so
I guess I don't know what I'm talkong about.
> So the problem here is actually
> Microsoft's way of presenting things as being the best, when they are not.
Um, who doesn't? Does Sun present their technologies as NOT being the best?
How about IBM? In fact, can you mention ONE company that advertises their
product as not being the best?
> It's the same policy applied with Windows (please excuse me if you think
> what
> I say is rude) and whith SQL Server.
I wouldn't say "rude." "Silly" comes to mind.
> But .NET is just another language
And here I've always thought .Net was language neutral. Oh well. Live and
learn!
--
Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
..Net Developer
The sun never sets on
the Kingdom of Heaven
"Win948576" <Win948576@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:546E4100-6806-40FC-AE98-686FB865CFBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Ok, read your "interesting" conversation. Pretty nice, really. But for a
> constructive thought you have to think longer. We all know there are just
> two
> platforms which have "legal" right to claim to be the platform of
> tomorrow,
> Java and .NET. Of course, .NET is a bit better because it had Java to
> learn
> from. That is what I read in most third party .NET documentations. But
> that's
> not the main problem here. .NET is better because of its properties,
> events,
> delegates and so on. Too bad it hasn't added alreadey generics. Mono is
> doing
> a great job porting .NET to other platforms and Microsoft should be
> thankful.
> Because whithout Mono, .NET wouldn't last. I am using Linux and I know
> what
> I'm talkong about.
>
> I think Rob's problem is that Java, nor .NET offers true "productivity
> whithout hedache" programming. Java is totaly nowhere whith its MVC
> patterns,
> which only make things hard to code, and C# makes things worst because it
> spoiles all expectancies of being the "one perfect language" we all heard
> about the way Microsoft presents it. So the problem here is actually
> Microsoft's way of presenting things as being the best, when they are not.
> It's the same policy applied with Windows (please excuse me if you think
> what
> I say is rude) and whith SQL Server. Oh, and even with Visual Studio. I am
> not complaining just to complain. But .NET is just another language - why
> then it is presented as being the best? I repeat, I AM a .NET coder, I DO
> like .NET better than Java because of its events and properties, but I
> would
> expect more.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- From: Rob R. Ainscough
- Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- From: Mark Rae
- Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- From: Rob R. Ainscough
- Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- From: Juan T. Llibre
- Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- From: Rob R. Ainscough
- Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- From: Juan T. Llibre
- Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- From: Win948576
- There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- Prev by Date: Re: CLR Integration vs DBA
- Next by Date: Re: Datatable in ViewState... why does this work?
- Previous by thread: Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- Next by thread: Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
