Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- From: "Rob R. Ainscough" <robains@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 16:27:40 -0700
Why are you intent on comparisons? I'm not, so why are you? Who does it
better, I don't know, don't care -- I just want the insanity of language of
the day to be over so we can concentrate on design and produce results and
less of "oh yeah, can't do that with ASP.NET so ya have to do some
JavaScript and do a little HTML setup work and...".
So I take it you agree with the obvious problem in efficiency? yes or no?
Against choice? You on planet earth -- this ain't the business of pic your
favorite iPod color -- stay within context.
You sound like a Microsoft troll -- get over your loyality already.
"Juan T. Llibre" <nomailreplies@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OMD884yhFHA.1044@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> re:
>> listing 90 languages on my resume
>
> I see you're against choice.
>
> Do you understand the difference between
> *choice* of languages and learning all of them ?
>
> re:
>> MS have the resources, not I -- and we should be there by now
>
> OK, if not MS, then who ? Who is doing a better job than MS ?
> Who is "there by now" ?
>
>
>
> Juan T. Llibre
> ASP.NET MVP
> http://asp.net.do/foros/
> Foros de ASP.NET en Español
> Ven, y hablemos de ASP.NET...
> ======================
>
> "Rob R. Ainscough" <robains@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:OjAH9xyhFHA.2904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Mark,
>>
>> Because, learning the language of the day to accomplish the same tasks
>> over and over is NOT efficient -- that's why. Like I said, listing 90
>> languages on my resume is more of an embarrassment than an
>> accomplishment. The concepts don't change, only the syntax and all the
>> restrictions and limitations that go with it.
>>
>> MS have the resources, not I -- and we should be there by now -- but as
>> it stands today, we're a good 5-10 years away.
>>
>> No one is forcing you to post a response -- so what is your point?? So
>> what is your point? Don't complain, don't make waves, just accept it --
>> is that how you think -- be a sheep, baaa baaa baaa
>>
>> Rob.
>
>> "Mark Rae" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:ucDDkUyhFHA.4000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> "Rob R. Ainscough" <robains@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:uwEe2LxhFHA.328@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>> There has got to be a better way?
>>>
>>> So why don't you develop it, smart-arse, instead of whinging because
>>> you're having to do some learning...?
>>>
>>> No-one's forcing you to use .NET.
>>>
>>> No-one's forcing you to write a single line of code.
>>>
>>> No-one's forcing you even to own a PC.
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- From: Juan T. Llibre
- Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- References:
- There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- From: Rob R. Ainscough
- Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- From: Mark Rae
- Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- From: Rob R. Ainscough
- Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- From: Juan T. Llibre
- There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- Prev by Date: Re: web app that can interact with other applications on the server
- Next by Date: Re: A way to control the code flow of an asp.net while it's running
- Previous by thread: Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- Next by thread: Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
