Re: ViewState vs Session
- From: "Kevin Spencer" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:00:24 -0400
If you are aware of the technical differences, why are you asking the
question? The answer should be obvious.
--
HTH,
Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
..Net Developer
Ambiguity has a certain quality to it.
"Vishwanathan Raman" <VishwanathanRaman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:D7283479-AB8B-4619-8A5E-541F468F15B2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi
>
> I am aware of the technical differences.But would like to get it
> clarified.Given an oppurtunity is ViewState storage more efficient than
> Session based.I do not have a scenario where I need to share information
> across pages but have lots of information to cache for that page.Can you
> please advise which is the efficient way to do it.The page is a search
> function which has a minimum of 10000 visitors per day.
>
> Regards
> Vishwanathan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ViewState vs Session
- From: Wilbur Slice
- Re: ViewState vs Session
- References:
- ViewState vs Session
- From: Vishwanathan Raman
- ViewState vs Session
- Prev by Date: RE: uploading permissions / virtual directories - help!
- Next by Date: Re: Block codes on ASP.NET
- Previous by thread: RE: ViewState vs Session
- Next by thread: Re: ViewState vs Session
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|