Re: Is the way i do, secure enought to avoid session hijacking



Have you considered routers that do NAT? If I'm not mistaken, requests
from different computers here on our corporate network will appear to
come from the same IP, so if I email a link to a co-worker, they might
end up with my session.

Just a thought.

-Phil

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: CBL Blacklist
    ... that SMTP server to hand off all mail to your ISP's outgoing ... I'm running Linux 2.6 on 3 computers. ... or NAT, simply a switch connecting the three computers. ... you still have to figure out just why you're listed in the CBL. ...
    (comp.unix.questions)
  • Re: NAT vs. Security
    ... > only be protected by the NAT feature of the router. ... accepts requests or what does it do? ... If it accepts requests and you arrange the NAT (port mapping ... isolation or protection and there is no authentication required or ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)
  • Re: router and firewall
    ... > the IP address of the router itself. ... The IP addresses of any computers behind the router, ... > the uninitiated, this makes a router with NAT seem like a firewall, but it ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: NAT vs. Security
    ... I have received a reply from Iomega -- the makers of the ... So with the combined protection afforded by the NAT and the required Iomega ... > accepts requests or what does it do? ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)
  • Re: Mac OS X at 8%
    ... Or is it that more Windows computers are hidden behind routers ... We're measuring usage, not units. ... Or 15 requests by one computer, as far as anybody outside the system ... If both PCs used the exact same version of IE7, hitslink wouldn't ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)