Re: Which one to use: 1.1 or 2.0?
- From: "Steve C. Orr [MVP, MCSD]" <Steve@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 11:18:02 -0700
ASP.NET 2.0 is significantly easier than ASP.NET 1.x (and WAY easier than
old ASP).
However, the documentation is still somewhat sparse for ASP.NET 2.0. There
are a lot of articles in magazines and online that describe the features
that can help you, but they're all based on various beta versions of ASP.NET
2.0 so they may not all work without modification.
So if you're adventurous, I'd say skip directly to ASP.NET 2.0. If you're
the conservative type then stick with ASP.NET 1.x for now.
--
I hope this helps,
Steve C. Orr, MCSD, MVP
http://SteveOrr.net
"dw" <cougarmana_NOSPAM@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OVr0ny8WFHA.3840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi, all. I'm an ASP.NET newbie and have access to both Visual Studio 2005
> Beta 2 and Visual Studio .NET 2003. If I'm building my first ASP.NET
> production app, which do you recommend? Is it easier to learn/use 2005 or
> are there more resources available for 2003? I have a strong background in
> ASP, but this is all new to me. If you can provide some pluses/minues of
> the two, that would be wonderful. Thanks.
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which one to use: 1.1 or 2.0?
- From: Kevin Spencer
- Re: Which one to use: 1.1 or 2.0?
- References:
- Which one to use: 1.1 or 2.0?
- From: dw
- Which one to use: 1.1 or 2.0?
- Prev by Date: Re: How do I loop through TextBoxes and clear them?
- Next by Date: Re: export to excel
- Previous by thread: Re: Which one to use: 1.1 or 2.0?
- Next by thread: Re: Which one to use: 1.1 or 2.0?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
