Re: compiled DLL's and performance
From: Kurt Schroeder (KurtSchroeder_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 02/08/05
- Next message: Granger Godbold: "Re: Certificates? Need guidance..."
- Previous message: Juan T. Llibre: "Re: compiled DLL's and performance"
- In reply to: William F. Robertson, Jr.: "Re: compiled DLL's and performance"
- Next in thread: Kurt Schroeder: "Re: compiled DLL's and performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:29:06 -0800
saw your posting from early this morning, thanks you. comment noted.
"William F. Robertson, Jr." wrote:
> When you start two threads with the same question, you probably should post
> a followup to your original post. It makes it easier to reply. Plus if you
> question wasn't answered, follow up with us, and we will followup with you.
>
> Unless you have a rolling 12 hour post...
>
> bill
>
> "Kurt Schroeder" <KurtSchroeder@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:F46A5F87-D5A9-42F8-9C0B-FD6F07A58B12@microsoft.com...
> > does compiling the code behind source using studio give and performance
> boost?
> > this is a rephrase of an a question i posted yesterday. To be honist
> VS.net
> > is becomming a pain to work with for asp.net. Vb.net and c.net hey, no
> > problem, but asp.net it seems to create way too much over head and
> > complication. thanks for listening and would appreciate an opinion.
> > thanks
> > kes
>
>
>
- Next message: Granger Godbold: "Re: Certificates? Need guidance..."
- Previous message: Juan T. Llibre: "Re: compiled DLL's and performance"
- In reply to: William F. Robertson, Jr.: "Re: compiled DLL's and performance"
- Next in thread: Kurt Schroeder: "Re: compiled DLL's and performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|