Re: ASP.NET 2.0

From: clintonG (csgallagher_at_REMOVETHISTEXTmetromilwaukee.com)
Date: 01/12/05


Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:40:08 -0600

I concur with Steve who by the way now has an ugly hair cut %-)

-- 
<%= Clinton Gallagher
         METROmilwaukee "Regional Information Services"
         NET csgallagher AT metromilwaukee.com
         URL http://clintongallagher.metromilwaukee.com/
"Steve C. Orr [MVP, MCSD]" <Steve@Orr.net> wrote in message
news:%23yJGrBH%23EHA.2196@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Juan, it seems a bit cavalier for you to claim that this beta software
won't
> screw up his VS.NET 2003 installation.
> That's exactly what happened with one of the beta builds I installed.
>
> I suggest people don't install the VS2005 beta on an important production
> machine.  Use a spare computer, or use a Virtual PC.
>
> -- 
> I hope this helps,
> Steve C. Orr, MCSD, MVP
> http://Steve.Orr.net
>
>
> "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailreplies@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:%239zwRWF%23EHA.3756@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> > VS.NET 2003 works with the .NET Framework 1.1.
> > You can't use it to develop ASP.NET 2.0 applications.
> >
> > To get started with ASP.NET 2.0, download VWD 2005:.
> >
> > It won't ruin your VS.NET 2003 setup.
> >
> >
> >
> > Juan T. Llibre
> > ASP.NET MVP
> > ===========
> > "Patrick.O.Ige" <PatrickOIge@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > news:3767583D-F71E-41A5-B914-ADD6A10A62B2@microsoft.com...
> >> Karl thx for the prompt reply.
> >> But i don't want to use "Visual Web Developer Express Edition 2005"
> >> I want to use VS.Net 2003!
> >> thx
> >>
> >>
> >> "Karl Seguin" wrote:
> >>
> >>> You can't with VS.Net 2003...
> >>>
> >>> To get started download the Visual Web Developer Express Edition 2005:
> >>> http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/express/vwd/default.aspx
> >>>
> >>> Karl
> >>>
> >>> -- 
> >>> MY ASP.Net tutorials
> >>> http://www.openmymind.net/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "Patrick.O.Ige" <PatrickOIge@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message
> >>> news:05D54A64-FF36-461A-8F02-702D7CACF9F5@microsoft.com...
> >>> > I have VS.Net 2003 and .Net framework 1.1..
> >>> > How can i get started with ASP.NET 2.0?
> >
> >
>
>


Relevant Pages

  • Re: ASP.NET 2.0
    ... Juan, it seems a bit cavalier for you to claim that this beta software won't ... screw up his VS.NET 2003 installation. ... That's exactly what happened with one of the beta builds I installed. ... >> Karl thx for the prompt reply. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: ASP.NET 2.0
    ... fine on my development machine, but I agree that it wouldn't be wise to put ... > Juan, it seems a bit cavalier for you to claim that this beta software ... > screw up his VS.NET 2003 installation. ... > That's exactly what happened with one of the beta builds I installed. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: Now thats monopoly power...
    ... Steve de Mena wrote: ... How could a Microsoft OS be in Beta 1 stage and "never be released"? ... If the delays in Vista are anything to go by, then MS may be forcing developers to expend resources on an OS they may never get released in the form in which they first present it. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Error opening & saving attachments in OE6
    ... Steve Cochran wrote: ... have affected my OE6 and/or the registry. ... advice for folks who reported the same problem, followed some of them, ... run ie6setupOe.exe with the "q" switch, but installation did not proceed. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress)
  • Re: Way to go Adobe!
    ... His beta software serial number has run out and you're blaming him, ... Adobe all along had stated that the beta would expire upon ... And yet, here you are, blaming Sandman for the expiration. ... You are one seriously screwed up person Steve. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)