Re: ASP.NET 2.0

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Karl Seguin (_at_)
Date: 01/12/05 

Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:12:50 -0500

Just to add my $0.02 to a topic which doesn't need it. I have both running
fine on my development machine, but I agree that it wouldn't be wise to put
it on an important machine.

Karl 

-- 
MY ASP.Net tutorials
http://www.openmymind.net/
"Steve C. Orr [MVP, MCSD]" <Steve@Orr.net> wrote in message
news:%23yJGrBH%23EHA.2196@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Juan, it seems a bit cavalier for you to claim that this beta software
won't
> screw up his VS.NET 2003 installation.
> That's exactly what happened with one of the beta builds I installed.
>
> I suggest people don't install the VS2005 beta on an important production
> machine.  Use a spare computer, or use a Virtual PC.
>
> -- 
> I hope this helps,
> Steve C. Orr, MCSD, MVP
> http://Steve.Orr.net
>
>
> "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailreplies@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:%239zwRWF%23EHA.3756@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> > VS.NET 2003 works with the .NET Framework 1.1.
> > You can't use it to develop ASP.NET 2.0 applications.
> >
> > To get started with ASP.NET 2.0, download VWD 2005:.
> >
> > It won't ruin your VS.NET 2003 setup.
> >
> >
> >
> > Juan T. Llibre
> > ASP.NET MVP
> > ===========
> > "Patrick.O.Ige" <PatrickOIge@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > news:3767583D-F71E-41A5-B914-ADD6A10A62B2@microsoft.com...
> >> Karl thx for the prompt reply.
> >> But i don't want to use "Visual Web Developer Express Edition 2005"
> >> I want to use VS.Net 2003!
> >> thx
> >>
> >>
> >> "Karl Seguin" wrote:
> >>
> >>> You can't with VS.Net 2003...
> >>>
> >>> To get started download the Visual Web Developer Express Edition 2005:
> >>> http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/express/vwd/default.aspx
> >>>
> >>> Karl
> >>>
> >>> -- 
> >>> MY ASP.Net tutorials
> >>> http://www.openmymind.net/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "Patrick.O.Ige" <PatrickOIge@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message
> >>> news:05D54A64-FF36-461A-8F02-702D7CACF9F5@microsoft.com...
> >>> > I have VS.Net 2003 and .Net framework 1.1..
> >>> > How can i get started with ASP.NET 2.0?
> >
> >
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: ASP.NET 2.0
    ... Juan, it seems a bit cavalier for you to claim that this beta software won't ... screw up his VS.NET 2003 installation. ... That's exactly what happened with one of the beta builds I installed. ... >> Karl thx for the prompt reply. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: ASP.NET 2.0
    ... I concur with Steve who by the way now has an ugly hair cut %-) ... > Juan, it seems a bit cavalier for you to claim that this beta software ... > screw up his VS.NET 2003 installation. ... > That's exactly what happened with one of the beta builds I installed. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: Recommendations for easy software installers?
    ... The scripting allows you to fine-tune how your "zip" will be constructed on ... your development machine, but it does not allow any control of what happens ... any installation that has non-standard installation folders ...
    (borland.public.delphi.thirdpartytools.general)
  • Re: Deployment Question
    ... Juan T. Llibre ... >I have an application (my first web) that I created on a development ... > The application can be run successfully by any client when hosted on my ... > development machine. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: Installshield Troubles
    ... Steve Pardee wrote in ... > no problems with the installation, but on execution I get the message ... that exist on your development machine, but do not exist on the target ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)