Re: "Page" class and utility class
From: Curt_C [MVP] (software_AT_darkfalz.com)
Date: 01/11/05
- Next message: Curt_C [MVP]: "Re: number of parameters in stored procedure"
- Previous message: Martin Eyles: "Re: Response.write"
- In reply to: Diffident: ""Page" class and utility class"
- Next in thread: Diffident: "Re: "Page" class and utility class"
- Reply: Diffident: "Re: "Page" class and utility class"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:33:22 -0600
You can persist through app variables, to some extent. Beyond that use a
DB/File/etc to persist data.
-- Curt Christianson Site & Scripts: http://www.Darkfalz.com Blog: http://blog.Darkfalz.com "Diffident" <Diffident@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:B66DAA58-1413-4D30-A815-EF814ACFDFFC@microsoft.com... > Hello All, > > I have written a webform which is by default derived from "Page" class. I > have coded another utility class with few methods and an object of this > class > is instantiated from the webfom class. > > Methods inside the utility class set few global variables which act as > mediums of persistence to hold data. Now my question is all works fine > during > my initial request and all the global variables are set correctly, but > during > later requests I doubt that global variables are holding null references. > Can > anyone give me a suitable explanation on this? > > I know that Page class is completely destroyed in the "Unload" method of > the > lifecycle but how about the utility class? Would it even be destroyed > along > with the webform class? > > Thanks for your pointers!!
- Next message: Curt_C [MVP]: "Re: number of parameters in stored procedure"
- Previous message: Martin Eyles: "Re: Response.write"
- In reply to: Diffident: ""Page" class and utility class"
- Next in thread: Diffident: "Re: "Page" class and utility class"
- Reply: Diffident: "Re: "Page" class and utility class"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]