Re: Serious cache problem - Page_Load get never get called !!!
From: Joerg Jooss (joerg.jooss_at_gmx.net)
Date: 01/03/05
- Next message: Chris: "Re: confirm messagebox, but after onclick firing"
- Previous message: Kevin Spencer: "Re: Organizing file resources in VS 2003 / VSS environment"
- In reply to: Mark Fitzpatrick: "Re: Serious cache problem - Page_Load get never get called !!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:52:31 +0100
Mark Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Appending the header doesn't necessarily tell the browser not to
> cache the page.
That's correct -- the HTTP spec distinguishes between caches and histories.
For histories, Cache-Control and such do not apply.
> For that, your best bet is to include the appropriate
> meta tag: <META HTTP-EQUIV="PRAGMA" CONTENT="NO-CACHE">. Using the
> meta tag may help catch more browsers than just the response header
> alone.
But only if the browser's HTTP implementation stinks. Out of curiosity: Can
you name any modern browser for which a META tag works, but a HTTP header
doesn't?
Cheers,
-- Joerg Jooss www.joergjooss.de news@joergjooss.de
- Next message: Chris: "Re: confirm messagebox, but after onclick firing"
- Previous message: Kevin Spencer: "Re: Organizing file resources in VS 2003 / VSS environment"
- In reply to: Mark Fitzpatrick: "Re: Serious cache problem - Page_Load get never get called !!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
