Re: File System
From: Jason Brown [MSFT] (i-brjaso_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 12/02/04
- Next message: Scott Allen: "Re: ASP.Net Worker Process Drops Out Yet Again!"
- Previous message: Richard Myers: "Re: ASP.Net Worker Process Drops Out Yet Again!"
- In reply to: Arpan: "File System"
- Next in thread: Patrick.O.Ige: "RE: File System"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:15:58 +1100
In theory, NTFS should be marginally (but pretty much unnoticeably) slower,
but in the real world the tiny performance hit is vastly outweighed by the
benefits you gain from enhanced security,
I would never advise deploying a website on a FAT volume
-- Jason Brown Microsoft GTSC, IIS This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "Arpan" <arpan_de@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:OvWm5rB2EHA.1292@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... Does the file system being used by the O.S. (i.e. FAT32 or NTFS) play a major role as far as executing ASP.NET applications are concerned? Or in other words, does the NTFS file system enhance the performance of ASP.NET applications? Thanks, Arpan
- Next message: Scott Allen: "Re: ASP.Net Worker Process Drops Out Yet Again!"
- Previous message: Richard Myers: "Re: ASP.Net Worker Process Drops Out Yet Again!"
- In reply to: Arpan: "File System"
- Next in thread: Patrick.O.Ige: "RE: File System"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
